Abstract
An introduction to the debate between direct and indirect realist theories of perception is given. It is pointed out that direct realist theories predominate among philosophy working in the philosophy of perception, while indirect realist theories predominate among scientists working in the neurosciences. Motivations for each position are given, along with pointing out their mutual incompatability.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
