Cell-Based Therapy in Cardiac Regeneration: An Overview.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Although pioneering preclinical research on the use of cell therapy for cardiac regeneration was conducted in the last quarter of the 20th century,1,2 a preponderance of advances have occurred in the 21st century, making this a relatively young field. In the first important clinical trial of cardiac cell therapy, begun in 2001, Menasche et al3 implanted autologous skeletal myoblasts into postinfarct scar at the time of coronary artery bypass surgery. Although the transplanted cells remained viable and exhibited contraction, they formed the nidus for serious ventricular tachyarrhythmias, which led to premature discontinuation of the trial. Despite this outcome, the trial energized the field, accelerating both preclinical and clinical research, albeit not with skeletal myoblasts. The extensive progress in cardiac regeneration is reviewed in this Compendium, and as occurs frequently in science, important observations have led to more questions and challenges (Table). View this table: Table. Important Challenges to Cell Therapy for Cardiac Regeneration Many cell types have been evaluated as candidates for cardiac regeneration. Among the earliest clinical trials, Zeiher’s group infused autologous bone marrow-derived progenitor cells into the coronary arteries of patients with acute,4 as well as healed myocardial infarction (MI)5 and reported improvements in left ventricular (LV) function. However, these results have not been fully confirmed by later studies, as pointed out in the review in the Compendium by Banarjee, Bolli, and Hare.6 Pittenger et al7 were among the first to direct attention to bone marrow-derived (stromal) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), emphasizing that these cells proliferated extensively in culture and suggesting that they could be attractive candidates for transplantation. In 2004, Chen et al8 reported that intracoronary infusion of autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs improved cardiac function. Zimmet and Hare pointed out that MSCs lack histocompatibility type II markers and elude rejection by …