Abstract

This study examines capital adequacy and the moderating impact of asset growth on the performance of firms in the agricultural sector. 4 listed agricultural firms were examined over a period of 10 years and data were extracted from their financial statements which were analyzed through a STATA 13 tool of analysis. Regression, correlation matrix and descriptive methods of analysis were employed to present and analyze results. Other post estimation tests like skewness and kurtosis test, Variance Inflation Factor test, specification test, heteroskedasticity tests and hausman test to select between fixed effect and random effect regression model were conducted to ensure robustness of results. The fixed effect stochastic longitudinal regression analysis model was adopted as guided by the hausman test. From the findings posited by the study, liquidity structure, liquidity structure moderated by asset growth and the combined effect of firm size moderated by asset growth were found to be significantly impacting on return on asset of firms at 1% level of significance. Firm size was found not to have any significant impact on return on assets. It was therefore recommended that the management should ensure considerable excess of current assets over current liabilities at all times so that there will always be positive liquidity structure; management should ensure consistent and prudent capital acquisition to ensure larger firm size; management should ensure steady asset growth by asset revaluation and new acquisition over time; the regulatory authority in the agricultural sector should establish a firm size benchmark below which no firm should operate.

Highlights

  • Capital adequacy is seen as the level of capital necessary for a firm as determined by the regulatory and supervisory authorities to assume the firm’s financial health and soundness

  • Ndifon & Ubana (2014) suggested that the issue of capital adequacy is of more interest in the banking industry because the banking industry is considered the back bone of every economy owing to the fact that it forms the financial threshold of every economy

  • The major objective of this study is to examine the impact of capital adequacy and the moderating effect of asset growth on the performance of firms in the Nigerian agricultural firms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Capital adequacy is seen as the level of capital necessary for a firm as determined by the regulatory and supervisory authorities to assume the firm’s financial health and soundness. Ndifon & Ubana (2014) suggested that the issue of capital adequacy is of more interest in the banking industry because the banking industry is considered the back bone of every economy owing to the fact that it forms the financial threshold of every economy They went further to opine that on the aspect of manufacturing firms, there is liberty of operation with regards to capital adequacy based on the financial strength of individual manufacturing firms and its ability to withstand competition in the sector. Ogodor & Mukolu (2015) posited that capital adequacy performs many functions in a firm: it determines and affects the level of performance of firms, for example, capital serves as a cushion for operational loss absorption; it creates shareholders’ confidence in the firm, it exposes the firm’s ability to finance its long term projects and capital expenditure To crown it all, the existence of adequate capital helps to minimize investors’ risk and improve performance. Musah (2018) provided evidence in Ghana how 17 listed banks apply capital structuring as a necessary tool in their bid to steer through their businesses given the turbulence operative environment. [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call