Abstract

European leaders created the European Space Research Organisation (ESRO) to compete with American scientific capabilities in space. ESRO's success, which contrasted sharply with the concurrent failure of the European Space Vehicle Launcher Development Organisation (ELDO), was based largely on successful use of American management methods. While ESRO's engineers and managers worked with NASA personnel, European companies hired American corporations to aid their efforts. When ESRO ran into financial difficulties in the late 1960s, they responded by adopting American project planning and financial estimation methods. ESRO formed the organisational base of the European Space Agency, and in the Spacelab project, NASA required that ESA employ even more American management processes. American contractors again aided the effort. Through the successive adoption and adaptation of American organisational models, ESRO and ESA successfully transferred American organisational expertise, and bridged the “management gap” originally perceived in the 1960s.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.