Abstract

An operational research was done to explore the effect of targeted food supplementation by comparing the birthweight of the babies of two areas (intervention & nonintervention). This record-based study was carried out in Kapasia and Savar upazila of Dhaka division, relying on the primary organizational data of 565 mothers. In the National Nutrition Program (NNP) area only fifty percent moderate to severe malnourished [Chronic Energy Deficiency (CED) II & III] mothers were preferably targeted for onsite food support while 34 of them managed to complete the full course. The mean (+/- SD) BMI of the supplemented mothers were lower (16.21 +/- 0.77) kg/m2, than non-supplemented mothers in Kapasia (17.14 +/- .82) kg/m2 and Savar 17.03 +/- 1.19) kg/m2 area. The mean (+/- SD) birth-weight for non NNP (Savar) category Mean (+/- SD) 2470+/- 366.03 grams, for NNP (Kapasia) non-supplemented group 2720.18 (+/- 368.63) grams and in Kapasia good supplemented group it was 2752.94 (+/- 344.86) grams. Supplemented and non-supplemented mothers of NNP mothers were four times more likely to deliver normal birthweight babies [odds ratio with 95%CI 3.84 (2.01, 7.34)] and [odds ratio with 95%CI 3.90 (2.17, 7.01)] than mothers of control area when adjusted for sociodemographic variables. Birth weight status improved with better CED levels. Birth weight adjusted for CED status, had no significant association with food supplementation. In this study, the basic findings were food supplementation could not increase birth-weight significantly as other effects contributed to improve birthweight were removed. As fully supplemented CED III mothers gave birth almost same weighted babies in comparison to the babies of CED I mothers; the recovery from the probability of being less weighted than the current status might be considered as a potential effect of food supplementation.

Highlights

  • Low birth weight is a major contributor to neonatal and postneonatal mortality

  • Collected data were cleaned, edited, analyzed and interpreted with the help of the computer by SPSS 16.0 for windows. This record-based study was carried out to explore the effect of targeted food supplementation comparing the pregnancy weight gain of the sample mothers of NNP and non NNP areas

  • Illiteracy rate was higher in Savar area mothers (21.4 %) and fathers (19.8%) than those of Kapasia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Twenty million infants worldwide, representing 15.5 per cent of all births, are born with low birthweight, 95.6 per cent of them in developing countries and almost 70 per cent of all low birthweight births occur in Asia, where perinatal and infant mortality is already high[1] and in Bangladesh the prevalence is forty percent[2] In both developed and developing countries, birth weight is probably the single most important factor that effects neonatal mortality, postneonatal mortality and of infant and childhood morbidity. Birth weight is an “input”–i.e., a proxy for the initial endowment of an infant’s “health human capital” Consistent with this view, researcher found that LBW infants tend to have lower educational attainment, poorer selfreported health status, and reduced employment and earnings as adults, relative to their normal weight counterparts[7]. Age of mothers in years ≤19 20-24 25-29 30-34 ≥35 Mothers education No education < Primary 5-9 years SSC and above Fathers’ education No education < Primary 5-9 years SSC and above Fathers’ occupation Unemployed Heavy worker Skilled labour

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call