Abstract
Bipolar complex fuzzy set (BCFS) is a more advanced and powerful phenomenon as it consists of two-dimensional data with positive and negative impacts of an element. It can solve the data consisting of the positive and negative impacts of an element which is a bipolar fuzzy set (BFS). It also covers the two-dimensional complex data which is a complex fuzzy set (CFS). Due to these attributes, BFS and CFS are less useful in comparison with BCFS to capture vagueness, complexity, and ambiguity in the data. Furthermore, lower and upper approximations based on equivalency relations constitute another significant phenomenon known as rough set (RS). This structure is also more powerful in dealing with real-life dilemmas. Rather than comparing the RS and BCFS, we combine both phenomena to handle the complexity more powerfully to deal with such types of phenomena that are not handled by other structures. So, by combining both phenomena, we introduce a novel structure known to be bipolar complex fuzzy rough set (BCFRS) in this manuscript. After that, we define some important operations, some significant properties related to this structure, and some aggregation operators (AOs) to solve decision-making (DM) problems related to cyber security. We address a practical application of cyber security (C-S) in computing for the protection of critical data to demonstrate the usefulness of the multi-attribute DM(MADM) approach. Based on the various criteria and attributes given by the experts, we find the best and better alternative to the C-S by applying the MADM approach. We get the A4 as the best and finest alternative by using bipolar complex fuzzy rough (BCFR) weighted arithmetic averaging (BCFRWAA), BCFR ordered weighted arithmetic averaging (BCFROWAA), and BCFR ordered weighted geometric averaging (BCFROWGA) operators. And, by using BCFR weighted geometric averaging (BCFRWGA), we get the A3 as the finest alternative. Lastly, to prove the superiority, validity, and generalization of our unique established theory, we give a detailed comparative study of our established work with several prevalent theories.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
