Abstract

BackgroundQuantification of malaria heterogeneity is very challenging, partly because of the underlying characteristics of mosquitoes and also because malaria is an environmentally driven disease. Furthermore, in order to assess the spatial and seasonal variability in malaria transmission, vector data need to be collected repeatedly over time (at fixed geographical locations). Measurements collected at locations close to each other and over time tend to be correlated because of common exposures such as environmental or climatic conditions. Non- spatial statistical methods, when applied to analyze such data, may lead to biased estimates. We developed rigorous methods for analyzing sparse and spatially correlated data. We applied Bayesian variable selection to identify the most important predictors as well as the elapsing time between climate suitability and changes in entomological indices.MethodsBayesian geostatistical zero-inflated binomial and negative binomial models including harmonic seasonal terms, temporal trends and climatic remotely sensed proxies were applied to assess spatio-temporal variation of sporozoite rate and mosquito density in the study area. Bayesian variable selection was employed to determine the most important climatic predictors and elapsing (lag) time between climatic suitability and malaria transmission. Bayesian kriging was used to predict mosquito density and sporozoite rate at unsampled locations. These estimates were converted to covariate and season-adjusted maps of entomological inoculation rates. Models were fitted using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation.ResultsThe results show that Anophele. gambiae is the most predominant vector (79.29%) and is more rain-dependant than its sibling Anophele. funestus (20.71%). Variable selection suggests that the two species react differently to different climatic conditions. Prediction maps of entomological inoculation rate (EIR) depict a strong spatial and temporal heterogeneity in malaria transmission risk despite the relatively small geographical extend of the study area.ConclusionMalaria transmission is very heterogeneous over the study area. The EIR maps clearly depict a strong spatial and temporal heterogeneity despite the relatively small geographical extend of the study area. Model based estimates of transmission can be used to identify high transmission areas in order to prioritise interventions and support research in malaria epidemiology.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13071-015-0679-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Quantification of malaria heterogeneity is very challenging, partly because of the underlying characteristics of mosquitoes and because malaria is an environmentally driven disease

  • The species of vectors and their densities, the species of the malaria parasites, the number of infected bites a human received per night can change from place to place and according to the season

  • We extended the methodology by introducing Bayesian variable selection to identify the most important climatic factors related to malaria transmission and take into account lag times between climatic suitability and malaria transmission

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quantification of malaria heterogeneity is very challenging, partly because of the underlying characteristics of mosquitoes and because malaria is an environmentally driven disease. In order to assess the spatial and seasonal variability in malaria transmission, vector data need to be collected repeatedly over time (at fixed geographical locations). We developed rigorous methods for analyzing sparse and spatially correlated data. It is transmitted from human to human via bites of mosquitoes infected with malaria parasites. A favorable environment and a complex system of malaria vectors and parasites maintain this endemicity. The mosquito development and survival strongly depend on prevailing climatic and environmental factors which in turn influence malaria transmission [1]. The species of vectors and their densities, the species of the malaria parasites, the number of infected bites a human received per night (a parameter known as the entomological inoculation rate, EIR) can change from place to place and according to the season. Malaria distribution is very heterogeneous within a geographical area and prone to between and within village variation [2,3]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call