Abstract

BackgroundPublic health provision in England is undergoing dramatic changes. Currently established partnerships are thus likely to be significantly disrupted by the radical reforms outlined in the Public Health White Paper. We therefore explored the process of partnership working in public health, in order to better understand the potential opportunities and threats associated with the proposed changes.Methodology/Principal Findings70 participants took part in an in-depth qualitative study involving 40 semi-structured interviews and three focus group discussions. Participants were senior and middle grade public health decision makers working in Primary Care Trusts, Local Authorities, Department of Health, academia, General Practice and Hospital Trusts and the third sector in England. Despite mature arrangements for partnership working in many areas, and much support for joint working in principle, many important barriers exist. These include cultural issues such as a lack of shared values and language, the inherent complexity of intersectoral collaboration for public health, and macro issues including political and resource constraints. There is particular uncertainty and anxiety about the future of joint working relating to the availability and distribution of scarce and diminishing financial resources. There is also the concern that existing effective collaborative networks may be completely disrupted as the proposed changes unfold. The extent to which the proposed reforms might mitigate or potentiate these issues remains unclear. However the threats currently remain more salient than opportunities.ConclusionsThe current re-organisation of public health offers real opportunity to address some of the barriers to partnership working identified in this study. However, significant threats exist. These include the breakup of established networks, and the risk of cost cutting on effective public health interventions.

Highlights

  • The public health function in England is facing dramatic change

  • The public health function was devolved to these organisations, and in order to aid partnership working in local areas, many Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) Directors of Public Health were jointly appointed between PCTs and Local Authorities (LAs) – these are the organizations responsible for a range of local services including housing, social services and urban regeneration [1]

  • Partnership working between PCTs and LAs has been facilitated through the development of Local Strategic Partnerships (LSPs), which take the form of partnerships between public, private and third sector organisations with the aim of creating a framework within which local partners can work together more effectively to secure the wellbeing of their area

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The public health function in England is facing dramatic change. Until recently Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) were responsible for the local public health function in England. Partnership working between PCTs and LAs has been facilitated through the development of Local Strategic Partnerships (LSPs), which take the form of partnerships between public, private and third sector organisations with the aim of creating a framework within which local partners can work together more effectively to secure the wellbeing of their area. These partnerships agree appropriate local targets (Local Area Agreements), informed by jointly undertaken needs assessments (Joint Strategic Needs Assessments) [2]. We explored the process of partnership working in public health, in order to better understand the potential opportunities and threats associated with the proposed changes

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call