Abstract

Tai people are widely distributed in Thailand, Laos and southwestern China and are a large population of Southeast Asia. Although most anthropologists and historians agree that modern Tai people are from southwestern China and northern Thailand, the place from which they historically migrated remains controversial. Three popular hypotheses have been proposed: northern origin hypothesis, southern origin hypothesis or an indigenous origin. We compared the genetic relationships between the Tai in China and their “siblings” to test different hypotheses by analyzing 10 autosomal microsatellites. The genetic data of 916 samples from 19 populations were analyzed in this survey. The autosomal STR data from 15 of the 19 populations came from our previous study (Lin et al., 2010). 194 samples from four additional populations were genotyped in this study: Han (Yunnan), Dai (Dehong), Dai (Yuxi) and Mongolian. The results of genetic distance comparisons, genetic structure analyses and admixture analyses all indicate that populations from northern origin hypothesis have large genetic distances and are clearly differentiated from the Tai. The simulation-based ABC analysis also indicates this. The posterior probability of the northern origin hypothesis is just 0.04 [95%CI: (0.01–0.06)]. Conversely, genetic relationships were very close between the Tai and populations from southern origin or an indigenous origin hypothesis. Simulation-based ABC analyses were also used to distinguish the southern origin hypothesis from the indigenous origin hypothesis. The results indicate that the posterior probability of the southern origin hypothesis [0.640, 95%CI: (0.524–0.757)] is greater than that of the indigenous origin hypothesis [0.324, 95%CI: (0.211–0.438)]. Therefore, we propose that the genetic evidence does not support the hypothesis of northern origin. Our genetic data indicate that the southern origin hypothesis has higher probability than the other two hypotheses statistically, suggesting that the Tai people most likely originated from southern China.

Highlights

  • Tai people are a subgroup of Tai language speakers who are widely distributed in Southeast Asia and the Yunnan Province of Southwest China

  • There are several popular hypotheses for the place from which the Tai people came, and these hypotheses can generally be summarized into two types: an indigenous origin hypothesis [3,7,8,9] and a migration hypothesis [1,2,5,6,10,11,12,13]

  • The migration hypothesis can be further divided into migration from northern China [1,2,10,11] and migration from southern China [5,6,12,13]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tai people are a subgroup of Tai language speakers who are widely distributed in Southeast Asia and the Yunnan Province of Southwest China. Tai people are the largest ethnic group in Thailand, but this ethnic group is called different names in other countries. They are called Dai in China, Shan in Burma and Lao in Laos. Different names are used in different countries or in different literature, most researchers agree that these Tai speakers share a recent common origin [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Even though most researchers agree that Tai people share a recent common origin, the source of the Tai migration remains controversial. The migration hypothesis can be further divided into migration from northern China (northern origin hypothesis) [1,2,10,11] and migration from southern China (southern origin hypothesis) [5,6,12,13]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.