Abstract

Orientation contrast is formed when some elements orient differently from their surroundings. Although orientation contrast can be processed in the absence of top-down attention, the underlying neural mechanism for this automatic processing in humans is controversial. In particular, whether automatic detection of orientation contrast occurs at the initial feedforward stage in the primary visual cortex (i.e., V1) remains unclear. Here, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the automatic processing of orientation contrast in humans. In three experiments, participants completed a task at fixation while orientation contrasts were presented in the periphery, either in the upper visual field (UVF) or the lower visual field (LVF). All experiments showed significant positive potentials evoked by orientation contrasts over occipital areas within 100 ms after stimulus onset. These contrast effects occurred 10–20 ms later than the C1 components evoked by identically located abrupt onset stimuli which indexes the initial feedforward activity in V1. Compared with those in the UVF, orientation contrasts in the LVF evoked earlier and stronger activities, probably reflecting a LVF advantage in processing of orientation contrast. Even when orientation contrasts were rendered almost invisible by backward masking (in Experiment 2), the early contrast effect in the LVF was not disrupted. These findings imply that automatic processing of orientation contrast could occur at early visual cortical processing stages, but was slightly later than the initial feedforward processing in human V1; such automatic processing may involve either recurrent processing in V1 or feedforward processing in early extrastriate visual cortex.Highlights -We examined the earliest automatic processing of orientation contrast in humans with ERPs.-Significant orientation contrast effect started within 100 ms in early visual areas.-The earliest orientation contrast effect occurred later than the C1 evoked by abrupt onset stimuli.-The earliest orientation contrast effect was independent of top-down attention and awareness.-Automatic detection of orientation contrast arises slightly after the initial feedforward processing in V1.

Highlights

  • Human beings are exposed to a large number of visual stimuli in daily life

  • The latencies of the early contrast effects were significantly longer than the latencies of C1 in both the upper visual field (UVF) (UVF contrast effect at site PO4: 97 ms; C1 at site POz: 77 ms; t(23) = 61.575, p < 0.001) and lower visual field (LVF) (LVF contrast effect at site POz: 93 ms; C1 at site POz: 81 ms; t(23) = 70.483, p < 0.001), showing a delay of nearly 20 ms in peak latency in the UVF, and a delay of approximate 12 ms in the LVF. These results indicated that, the early activities related to automatic processing of orientation contrast occurred shortly after stimulus onset at occipital sites for both the UVF and LVF, they were still later than the C1 components evoked by abrupt onset stimuli presented at the same locations

  • The present study investigated the early automatic processing of orientation contrast with experiment settings that minimized the influence of top-down attention and facilitated the observation of early scalp event-related potential (ERP)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Human beings are exposed to a large number of visual stimuli in daily life. Usually, only a small portion of these stimuli are subjected to top-down attention and consciously processed, while the others do not undergo sufficient processing (see Desimone and Duncan, 1995 for a review). As shown in previous animal studies, response of a V1 neuron can be significantly influenced by contextual input outside but near its receptive field (Knierim and van Essen, 1992; Lamme, 1995) These findings suggest that a contrast effect at early visual cortical processing stages is highly local. C1 of the abrupt onset stimuli (for example, having longer latencies than the C1), we may infer that detection of orientation contrast occurs later than the initial feedforward processing in human V1

Method
Result
Findings
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call