Abstract

Optic flow that simulates self-motion often produces postural adjustment. Although literature has suggested that human postural control depends largely on visual inputs from the lower field in the environment, effects of the vertical location of optic flow on postural responses are not well investigated. Here, we examined whether optic flow presented in the lower visual field produces stronger responses than optic flow in the upper visual field. Either expanding or contracting optic flow was presented in upper, lower, or full visual fields through an Oculus Rift head-mounted display. Head displacement and vection strength were measured. Results showed larger head displacement under the optic flow presentation in the full visual field and the lower visual field than the upper visual field, during early period of presentation of the contracting optic flow. Vection was strongest in the full visual field and weakest in the upper visual field. Our findings of lower field superiority in head displacement and vection support the notion that ecologically relevant information has a particularly important role in human postural control and self-motion perception.

Highlights

  • We investigated whether optic flow presented in the lower visual field has a predominant role in postural control

  • We examined whether optic flow presented in the lower visual field has a predominant role in postural control, as previously suggested (Agathos et al, 2017; Baumberger et al, 2004; Fluckiger & Baumberger, 1988; Gibson, 1950; Previc, 1998; Tamada & Seno, 2015) but not directly confirmed

  • We demonstrated that optic flow presented in the lower visual field produced larger head displacement than optic flow presented in the upper visual field

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Standing in a challenging posture without vision is difficult (Lee & Lishman, 1977). When visual stimulation simulating selfmotion, known as optic flow, is presented in a large area of the visual field, a standing observer often sways in the same direction as visual motion (visually evoked postural response [VEPR]; Berthoz, Lacour, Soechting, & Vidal, 1979; Dichgans & Brandt, 1978; Lee & Aronson, 1974; Lee & Lishman, 1975; Lestienne et al, 1977; Stoffregen, 1985; van Asten et al, 1988a, 1988b) to stabilize balance of the body (Lestienne et al, 1977; Lishman & Lee, 1973)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.