Abstract
Falsification of hadiths has spread tremendously among society as the dissemination of fabricated hadiths has been normalised among the public and Islamic and religious scholars. This issue is not a new phenomenon but has been evolving since the hadiths were transmitted orally and developed through writing such as books and so on. It is also a well-known fact that hadith scholarship's contribution via writings includes written materials from the current and past Islamic and religious scholars, including Siamese scholars. This article aims to discover the authenticity of hadiths in ‘Kitab al-Nikah’ from the book of ‘Bulughul Maram min Adillat al-Ahkam’ written by al-Hafiz ibn Hajar (m. 852H). Even though al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar mentioned the majority of the sources for the hadiths, yet there are some hadiths which sources are left unmentioned. He also divided the hadiths into thematic points, although few hadiths have not been categorised under suitable themes. All of the hadiths will be analysed in terms of their authenticity, tanasub and suitability in terms of nikah. In order to identify the status and authenticity of the hadiths, a specific method will be used: takhrij (retrieval) based on the theme of the hadiths. A descriptive method will be used to analyse the hadiths in the tanasub point of view and the suitability of the hadith towards certain themes. The research showed that 86% of the hadiths found in ‘Kitab al-Nikah’ are authentic and based on authorised and muktabar books of hadiths. In addition, 95% of the hadiths chosen were relevant and suitable with the theme of nikah.
Highlights
Al-Hadith sebagaimana disepakati ulama adalah sumber kedua selepas al-Quran, namun dari segi autoriti dan autentikasi al-Hadith tidak sama dengan al-Quran
Oleh kerana subjek kajian merupakan hadith-hadith dalam ‘Kitab al-Nikah’, maka metode takhrij yang akan digunakan ialah takhrij melalui tema hadith dan pangkal hadith
Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyyah. [39] Zulfahmi Alwi (2010), Metodologi Takhrij al-Hadis, Jurnal Tahdis, 1(1)
Summary
Al-Hadith sebagaimana disepakati ulama adalah sumber kedua selepas al-Quran, namun dari segi autoriti dan autentikasi al-Hadith tidak sama dengan al-Quran. Abi Talib ra dan lain-lain lagi.[12] Selain menggunakan metode penerimaan hadith yang ketat, mereka juga mengimplementasikan beberapa kaedah verifikasi hadith seperti membanding hadith-hadith yang diriwayatkan dengan ayat al-Qur’an, melakukan pemeriksaan silang dengan makna hadith lainnya, menuntut persaksian bersumpah dari perawi hadith, menguji perawi dengan riwayatnya itu, menyoal siasat perawi berkenaan riwayatnya, melakukan rihlah atau pengembaraan bertujuan pengesanan dan pengesahan hadith, mengesahkan satu riwayat hadith dengan riwayat perawi lainnya dan sebagainya.[13] Semua ini dilakukan atas dasar kefahaman mereka yang mendalam terhadap kedudukan Sunnah sebagai sumber kedua dalam agama yang tidak boleh dikompromi dengan sebarang kesilapan periwayatan, apatah lagi melibatkan status hadith yang lemah dan palsu. Setiap Muslim perlu meverifikasi hadith yang diterima sebelum dijadikan hujah atau dipraktiskan
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
