Abstract

Abstract The effects of the austenitizing temperature and the cooling rate upon the kinetic of athermal martensitic transformation in a microalloyed steel were evaluated. Considering the studied steel, the knowledge about these effects on the martensitic transformation has a great relevance for naval manufacturers and steel researchers. In this study, computational simulation was performed aiming to evaluate the phase’s stability. Specimens were submitted to quenching simulations in a dilatometer, considering four different austenitizing temperatures and four cooling rates. The results shown that the austenite chemical composition was not significantly affected by the austenitizing temperatures. Both the austenitic grain size and the cooling rate affected the martensitic transformation kinetics. The larger the austenitic grain size, the higher the Ms. The austenitic grain growth promoted a decrease in the required chemical energy to compensate the free energy increase associated with the lattice strain and the creation of new interfaces, leading to a lower austenite undercooling. An extrinsic effect of the cooling rate on the Ms was observed. For lower cooling rates, the carbide precipitation modified que austenite chemical composition, changing its stability and increasing Ms. A predictability equation, correlating the MS with the austenite grain size and the steel cooling rate, was proposed.

Highlights

  • Athermal martensitic transformations are usually observed in several types of steels

  • The available scientific literature highlights that the overall martensitic transformation kinetics is strongly affected by the austenite chemical composition and by the applied cooling rate

  • Considering the standardized relatively low heating rate and the great soaking time used in this study, it is reasonable to suppose that, for the evaluated austenitizing temperatures (920°C, 1000°C, 1150°C and 1300°C) there is not significant differences in the austenite chemical compositions immediately after the austenitizing procedure[2]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Athermal martensitic transformations are usually observed in several types of steels In this martensitic transformation mode, the martensite fraction does not depend on the holding time in a specific temperature below the M S. The available scientific literature highlights that the overall martensitic transformation kinetics is strongly affected by the austenite chemical composition and by the applied cooling rate. They present that the austenitic grain size has a strong effect on the martensite start temperature, but not on the transformation evolution. These effects are verified in different levels for different type of steels[2,3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call