Abstract
James Langenfeld and Wenqing Li claim that the market delineating criterion of Øystein Daljord, Lars Sørgard, and Øyvind Thomassen for an asymmetric small, but significant and nontransitory increase in price (SSNIP) is logically inconsistent and tends to define too broad antitrust markets. We show that these claims are false.
Paper version not known (
Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have