Abstract

Simple SummaryThe present study reported two missense mutations in the buffalo GHR gene: A novel (c.380G>A) and (c.836T>A) which was described in previous studies. These two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were found to be associated with milk yield, fat %, protein %, and 305 day-milk, fat and protein yield, with higher performance for AA haplotype animals. Therefore, selection of buffaloes with AA haplotype would more likely improve milk production traits. Consequently, this would allow breeders to take more precise selection decisions, leading to significantly higher productivity and profitability within the Egyptian buffalo herds.For its role in the mediation of growth hormone (GH) galactopoietic effect, growth hormone receptor (GHR) was considered a functional candidate gene for milk performance in cattle. However, its genetic variation and potential effect have not been investigated in Egyptian buffaloes. This study aimed to screen GHR for polymorphisms and study their associations with milk traits in Egyptian buffaloes. Polymerase chain reaction, single-strand conformation polymorphism, and sequencing were used to identify mutations in 4 exons (E4–E6 and E8) of the GHR gene in 400 Egyptian buffaloes. No polymorphisms were found in E4, while 2 SNPs (c.380G>A/p.Arg127Lys and c.387C>T/p.Gly129) in E5, one silent mutation (c.435A>G/p.Pro145) in E6, and another missense mutation (c.836T>A/p.Phe279Tyr) in E8 were detected. The c.380G>A SNP in the extracellular domain was associated with milk yield, fat %, protein %, and 305-day milk, fat and protein yield, with higher levels in animals carrying the mutant A allele. The c.836T>A SNP in the transmembrane domain was associated with milk yield, fat %, protein %, and 305-day milk, fat and protein yield, with higher milk yield and lower fat %, protein %, fat and protein yield in the mutant A allele-animals. Interestingly, animals with the two mutant AA alleles produced higher milk yield, fat %, protein %, fat and protein yield, accompanied with upregulated expressions of GHR, GH, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), prolactin (PRL), prolactin receptor (PRLR), β-casein (encoded by CSN2 gene), and diacylglycerol acyltransferase-1 (DGAT1) genes and proteins in milk somatic cells. Therefore, selection of Egyptian buffaloes with mutant AA haplotypes for the novel c.380G>A SNP and the well-known c.836T>A SNP could improve milk yield and quality in buffaloes.

Highlights

  • Low milk production of buffaloes is one of the most challenging problems on Egyptian dairy farms, which is mainly attributable to poor environmental conditions, malnutrition, and poor genetic capabilities

  • growth hormone receptor (GHR) protein is a member of the type 1 cytokine/hematopoietin receptor family, that consists of signal sequence, extracellular, transmembrane, and long intracellular domains [2]

  • The milk yield of Egyptian buffaloes is inferior when compared to foreign buffaloes due to many environmental, nutritional, and genetic causes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Low milk production of buffaloes is one of the most challenging problems on Egyptian dairy farms, which is mainly attributable to poor environmental conditions, malnutrition, and poor genetic capabilities. A non-synonymous SNP in GHR E8 (c.836T>A, p.Phe279Tyr) is responsible for the substitution of phenylalanine (neutral aa) with tyrosine (polar un-charged aa), in the transmembrane domain of the GHR protein This substitution was significantly associated with milk production and milk fat and protein contents [5,6,8,9]. Animals with the mutant A allele produce higher milk yield, but lower fat and protein yields than those with the T allele [5,6,7,10] Most of these previous studies identified c.836T>A as a causative SNP for milk production QTL in cattle, some other SNPs such as a silent mutation (SNP c.463C>T, p.Leu155) in E6 of bovine GHR were significantly associated with higher milk yield and superior milk quality (high protein, casein, and fat yields and percentages) with higher milk coagulation properties and lower somatic cells score [11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.