Abstract
Purpose The study aimed to evaluate the visual quality of forme fruste keratoconus (FFK) and mild and moderate keratoconus by using an optical quality analysis system II (OQAS-II) and to explore the correlation between optical quality parameters and the disease progression. Methods Twenty-one normal eyes, twenty-one FFK eyes, twenty-one mild keratoconus eyes, and twenty-one moderate keratoconus eyes were included in this prospective study. The optical quality parameters, such as object scatter index (OSI), modulation transfer function cutoff (MTF cutoff), strehl ratio (SR), and OQAS-II values at contrasts of 100% (OV-100), 20% (OV-20), and 9% (OV-9), were measured by OQAS-II. The repeatability of these parameters was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), repeatability coefficient (RC), and coefficient of variation (CVw). Correlations between optical quality parameters and mean central keratometry readings (Kmean) were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the parameters were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Results All the optical quality parameters among four groups showed good repeatability (all ICC≥0.75). The MTF cutoff, SR, OV-100, OV-20, OV-9 in FFK, mild and moderate keratoconus eyes were significantly lower than those in the normal group (all P < 0.05). The ROC analyses of the MTF cutoff, SR, OV-100, OV-20, and OV-9 showed significant area under the curve (AUC) in discriminating FFK form normal, mild keratoconus from FFK, and moderate keratoconus from mild keratoconus (all P < 0.05). The ROC analyses of the MTF cutoff, SR, OV-100, OV-20, and OV-9 showed significant area under the curve (AUC) in discriminating FFK form normal, mild keratoconus from FFK, and moderate keratoconus from mild keratoconus (all P < 0.05). The ROC analyses of the MTF cutoff, SR, OV-100, OV-20, and OV-9 showed significant area under the curve (AUC) in discriminating FFK form normal, mild keratoconus from FFK, and moderate keratoconus from mild keratoconus (all P < 0.05). The ROC analyses of the MTF cutoff, SR, OV-100, OV-20, and OV-9 showed significant area under the curve (AUC) in discriminating FFK form normal, mild keratoconus from FFK, and moderate keratoconus from mild keratoconus (all P < 0.05). The ROC analyses of the MTF cutoff, SR, OV-100, OV-20, and OV-9 showed significant area under the curve (AUC) in discriminating FFK form normal, mild keratoconus from FFK, and moderate keratoconus from mild keratoconus (all Kmean) were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the parameters were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). r = −0.710, P < 0.05). The ROC analyses of the MTF cutoff, SR, OV-100, OV-20, and OV-9 showed significant area under the curve (AUC) in discriminating FFK form normal, mild keratoconus from FFK, and moderate keratoconus from mild keratoconus (all Conclusion The repeatability of OQAS-II is good in measuring visual quality of normal as well as FFK, mild, and moderate keratoconus. The visual quality of the FFK, mild, and moderate keratoconus is worse than that in normal eyes. The OQAS-II has the potential value in screening FFK from normal eyes and might be a useful tool for evaluating the progression of keratoconus.
Highlights
Keratoconus is a degenerative disorder characterized by corneal thinning and conical-shaped protrusion of the cornea [1]
Our findings showed that optical quality analysis system II (OQAS-II) had good repeatability in measuring visual quality of normal, forme fruste keratoconus (FFK), AK1, and AK2. e visual quality in FFK, AK1, and AK2 was inferior to that in normal
Our results showed that the MTF cutoff was significantly associated with keratometry readings (Kmean) in keratoconus eyes
Summary
Keratoconus is a degenerative disorder characterized by corneal thinning and conical-shaped protrusion of the cornea [1]. It usually happens in adolescence and progresses until the third or fourth decade of life [2]. Several studies have found that the keratoconus patients have bad visual quality by questionnaire investigations [6,7]. It has been identified that the mild and moderate keratoconus had lower grades than normal people according to the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 [8]. Leonard et al [13] reported that the OSI was increased in keratoconic eyes and could be considered as a clinically significant parameter to stage keratoconus by directly evaluating visual quality. To the best of our knowledge, comparisons of all the parameters among FFK, mild keratoconus, moderate keratoconus patients, and normal have not yet been reported
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have