Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to provide an updated analysis of the cost of screening for ovarian cancer in the United States. Here, we use updated information from the University of Kentucky Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial in conjunction with new modifying factors such as U.S. national estimates of the cost of care (Truven Health MarketScan Database), recently published estimates of earnings lost due to ovarian cancer death and estimates of federal income taxes paid on those earnings. In total, 326,998 screens were performed during the Kentucky trial from 1987 to 2019. At a cost of $56 per screen, we estimate that the total base cost to operate the program over the last 32 years is $18,311,888. When accounting for the surgical cost of 381 false-positive cases, the total cost of the screening program increases by $3,030,474. However, these costs are offset by the benefit of treating more early-stage ovarian cancer in the screened population, with a total cost advantage of $4,016,475 at our institution (Kentucky) or $1,525,050 ($725,700–$3,312,650) (U.S.) nationally. Additionally, program costs are offset by approximately $3,549,000 due to the potential earnings gained by the 26 women whose lives have been saved with screening. Furthermore, the cost of the program is offset by the federal tax dollars paid on the recovered earnings and amounts to $383,292. Ultimately, the net adjusted total cost of the Kentucky screening program is an estimated $13,393,595 at our institution or $15,885,020 ($13,978,068–$16,799,083) nationally. Thus, the adjusted cost per screen is an estimated $40.96 in Kentucky or $48.58 ($42.75–$51.37) nationally.

Highlights

  • Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer death in women in the United States.In 2019, it is estimated that 22,530 U.S women will be diagnosed with ovarian cancer, with 13,980 deaths due to this disease [1]

  • Four major trials have evaluated the utility of using transvaginal ultrasound to detect ovarian cancer including the Kentucky trial [4], the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial [5], the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) [6] and the Shizuoka Cohort

  • 86 ± 4%, 68 ± 7%, and 65 ± 7% at 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. These survival rates are significantly different from unscreened women who were diagnosed with clinically detected ovarian cancer at the different from unscreened women who were diagnosed with clinically detected ovarian cancer at the Clinically detected women at University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center (UKMCC) have much lower survival rates of 45 ± 2%, 34 ± 2%, UKMCC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2019, it is estimated that 22,530 U.S women will be diagnosed with ovarian cancer, with 13,980 deaths due to this disease [1]. This high fatality rate can be mostly attributed to the high prevalence of advanced stage-disease (70%) at initial diagnosis [2]. Five-year survival rates vary widely between advanced-stage disease (20–30%) and early-stage disease (70–90%), where tumor growth is confined to the ovary [3]. Over the last three decades, a concerted effort has been made to develop an accurate, reliable and cost-effective screening modality to detect early-stage ovarian cancer. Four major trials have evaluated the utility of using transvaginal ultrasound to detect ovarian cancer including the Kentucky trial [4], the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial [5], the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) [6] and the Shizuoka Cohort

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call