Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are already integrated and expected to expand within the aviation sociotechnical ecosystem. Machine Learning (ML) models are capable and could excel on accident report classification tasks within the aviation context, assuming adequate and proper training. Human subject matter experts (SMEs) and the open access AI ChatGPT reanalyzed the TransAsia Airways flight GE235, Air France AF447, and Helios Airways Flight HCY552 accidents using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to investigate whether the AI agent is capable of conducting aviation accident analysis and comparing raters’ results, of verifying AI’s learning abilities, and, finally, investigating whether AI analysis could expand in other systems-based models. The results suggested that: (a) AI/ML applications could be an efficient tool for learning organizations’ continuous learning, growth, and improvement by creating new knowledge from previous failures, (b) the proper prompts and well-established frameworks could optimize the agreement between human SMEs and AI in accident analysis, (c) the ChatGPT performed better on linear models (i.e., Bowtie) compared to complex systemic accident causation models (e.g., HFACS), (d) the ChatGPT could not conduct high- and low-level analysis simultaneously, and, (e) a multidisciplinary team including human factors, IT, and accident investigators experts is essential in developing and overseeing the W-shaped learning assurance process.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call