Application of personalized endoscopic techniques in surgery of endonasal resection of petroclival lesions

To review the development of endoscopic techniques in breast surgery, focusing on their use in benign breast lump resection and breast-conserving surgery for cancer, and also summarize the development and application of these techniques in China, highlighting promotion and homogenization challenges and future directions. A systematic review of relevant literature was conducted to trace the historical evolution, clinical applications, and related research of endoscopic techniques in breast surgery, emphasizing their advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic benign breast lump resection and breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Endoscopic benign breast lump resection and breast-conserving surgery for cancer have improved patients' postoperative psychological health and quality of life, particularly in scar-free surgery. However, challenges such as limited intraoperative visibility and prolonged surgery time lead to controversy in clinical practice. Despite significant advancements, endoscopic techniques in breast surgery also face challenges. Future efforts should focus on technological improvements and clinical research to address these issues, promoting widespread application and standardization. The key to future development lies in the promotion and homogenization of these technologies.

Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial

Hemispherectomy is the most promising treatment for patients with severe hemispheric intractable epilepsy. Several techniques for this surgical intervention have been established, but the choice of technique is currently mostly dependent on the surgeon’s experience with a specific approach. We aim to demonstrate whether the choice of the surgical technique moderates surgical outcome in patients with severe hemispheric intractable epilepsy, as measured by seizure freedom and the incidence of death after surgery. We extracted 2382 articles from PubMed and Cochrane. Two independent experts selected 555 articles. We performed a meta‐analysis for all studies and a pooled data analysis for studies where information on individual patients was available. None of the retrieved studies was randomized. Disconnective surgery yielded significantly higher rates of seizure freedom (0.83) than resective (0.70, p < 0.001) or combined surgery (0.64, p < 0.001) for patients with at least 1 year follow–up ( N cases = 1165). For death ( N cases = 1197), resective surgery had the highest rate of death within a year (0.07), significantly higher than disconnective surgery (0.012, p = 0.001) and combined surgical techniques (0.006, p < 0.001). The assessed techniques did not systematically differ in rate of acute complications, but in their type, for example, acute neurological complications were most common after disconnective surgery ( p < 0.001), unspecific symptoms after resective surgery ( p < 0.004). Chronic neurological complications were most common after resective surgery ( p < 0.001). Seizure freedom is more likely following disconnective surgery as compared to resective or combined techniques. Disconnective and combined surgical techniques lead to fewer chronic complications and death than resective approaches.

While the ACOSOG and ALaCaRT trials found that laparoscopic resections for rectal cancer failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of pathologic outcomes when compared with open resections, the COLOR II and COREAN studies demonstrated non-inferiority of clinical outcomes, leading to uncertainty regarding the value of minimally invasive (MIS) techniques in rectal cancer surgery. We analyzed differences in pathologic and clinical outcomes between open versus MIS resections for rectal cancer. We identified patients who underwent resection for stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma from the National Cancer Database (2010-2015). Surgical approach was categorized as open or MIS (laparoscopic or robotic). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to assess differences in outcomes and survival. Analysis was performed in an intention-to-treat fashion. A total of 31,190 patients who underwent rectal adenocarcinoma resection were identified, of whom 52.8% underwent open resection and 47.2% underwent MIS resection (31.0% laparoscopic, 16.2% robotic). After adjustment for patient, tumor, and institutional characteristics, MIS approaches were associated with significantly decreased risk of positive circumferential resection margins (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94), increased likelihood of harvesting ≥ 12 lymph nodes (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21), shorter length of stay (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.53-0.62), and improved overall survival (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98). MIS approaches to rectal cancer resection were associated with improved pathologic and clinical outcomes when compared to the open approach. In this nationwide, facility-based sample of cancer cases in the United States, our data suggest superiority of MIS techniques for rectal cancer treatment.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Not Your Father's Polypectomy Anymore

Focal brain lesions may underlie generalized tonic seizures, as seen in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, by engaging bilateral neural networks. However, this seizure type is often not considered surgically remediable. Here, we describe the resolution of apparent electroclinically classic generalized tonic seizures in children originating from a unifocal brain lesion following resective or ablative surgery. This study aims to contribute to emerging evidence that prompt removal of a lesion may resolve generalized seizures by ameliorating aberrant network activity. Boston Children's Hospital's (BCH) epilepsy surgical database was reviewed to identify children with tonic seizures due to a focal brain lesion who remained seizure-free for longer than 1 year following resective or ablative surgery. Five children were identified, of whom three underwent resective surgery and two laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). Age at epilepsy onset varied from 1 month to 7.25 years, and age at first epilepsy surgery ranged from 5.6 to 9.5 years. Lesions were predominantly located in the frontal lobe (n = 3), and focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) was the most common underlying etiology (n = 3), followed by vascular lesions (n = 2). At last follow-up, seizure freedom (Engel Class 1A) ranged between 1.7 and 4.4 years. This study presents evidence that resection or ablation of a focal cortical lesion can resolve generalized tonic seizures. The findings also lend credence to the hypothesis that heterogeneous brain lesions can underlie shared electroclinical features through engaging similar brain networks. Children with tonic seizures in whom a lesional etiology is presumed should undergo timely surgical evaluation, as removal of a focal lesion may arrest the evolution of a secondary epileptic network and allow for the restoration of normal brain network development.

About half of patients who have Haglund disease may require treatment by surgical resection of the superior portion of the calcaneal tuberosity. Endoscopic techniques have been described as alternatives to open surgery, but only results of uncontrolled retrospective clinical investigations have been reported. Up to now no research is available which compares these different procedures. A controlled laboratory study was done to evaluate the morphologic appearance of the superior portion of the calcaneal tuberosity after endoscopic or open resection. The tuberosity was resected in 15 isolated fresh-frozen human cadaver lower limb specimens with either open (nine) or endoscopic (six) technique. Outcome was measured radiographically. Iatrogenic soft-tissue lesions of the distal Achilles tendon, plantaris tendon and sural nerve caused by the surgical procedure were evaluated by direct observation after anatomic dissection. Radiographs revealed that the slope of the resection line (osteotomy angle) was steeper (p = 0.017) and the resected protruberance was larger (p = 0.003), while the remaining posterior rim was smaller (p = 0.048) after open resection than after endoscopic resection. Macroscopic analysis indicated that both approaches may damage soft tissues particularly the medial Achilles tendon column and in the plantaris tendon (relative risk = 0.5 in either group). Iatrogenic sural nerve injuries were found after both techniques (relative risk = 0.2 for endoscopic and 0.1 for open resection). Residual bursa tissue was detected only after endoscopy (relative risk = 0.3), while loose bony fragments were present only after open surgery (relative risk = 0.4). The medial column of the Achilles tendon, the plantaris tendon, and the sural nerve are at risk in both open and endoscopic resection for Haglund disease.

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Technique for Chest Wall Resection

Impact of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of lesions in the right posterosuperior liver segments on surgical outcomes: A multicenter study based on propensity score analysis

Liver (hepatic) resection refers to removal of the whole liver, or one or more of its vascular segments. Elective liver resection is mainly performed for benign and malignant liver tumours. The operation can be performed as an open procedure or with a laparoscopic approach. With the advancement of laparoscopic skills and equipment, liver resection is selectively being carried out with this approach. A laparoscopic procedure is intended to be less severe, allowing for quicker healing, fewer complications, and a shorter hospital stay as the insult to the body is minimised. However, evidence about the efficacy of this approach when compared to an open procedure is still scattered. Current practice at different hepato-pancreato-biliary centres is based on the clinical judgement of experts in their field, which is highly insufficient in terms of evidence. To assess the benefits and harms of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for benign or malignant lesions on the liver in adult patients. We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until February 2013. We also conducted searches of reference lists of relevant articles and reviews, conference proceedings, and ongoing trial databases. We searched for randomised clinical trials of participants undergoing liver resection for benign or malignant lesions which reported on benefits and harms. We searched for quasi-randomised or observational studies for reports of harm. No data from randomised clinical trials could be collected. Two authors performed study selection independently. We were not able to identify any randomised clinical trials that met the inclusion criteria of our review protocol. We identified two ongoing randomised clinical trials performed in Europe with data yet to be published. We retrieved a few observational studies (prospective and retrospective) with the searches for randomised clinical trials. They included a limited number of participants in whom laparoscopic and open liver resection was compared. Since these studies were non-randomised observational studies, the results for any adverse events are not included in the review as the risk of bias in such studies is high. No conclusions can be made at this time as no randomised clinical trials are available. In addition to the two ongoing randomised clinical trials for which results are expected to be published in the near future, well-designed, prospective, randomised clinical trials are needed in order to evaluate the benefits and harms of the laparoscopic procedure versus open liver resection.

Intelligence quotient (IQ) as a predictor of epilepsy surgery outcome

Petroclival tumors such as petroclival meningiomas or trigeminal schwannomas extending to the posterior cranial fossa are challenging to treat due to their deep-seated location and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic transorbital surgery for the resection of central skull base tumors involving the petroclival area. The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 32 patients with petroclival tumors including meningiomas and trigeminal schwannomas who underwent endoscopic transorbital surgery between September 2017 and December 2022. Preoperative clinical and radiological data were collected, and patients were followed up postoperatively for a median period of 34.7 months. Surgical technique, complications, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Endoscopic transorbital surgery provided a minimally invasive and direct corridor to the petroclival region. All 32 patients successfully underwent tumor resection, with gross-total or near-total tumor resection achieved in 28 patients. The mean tumor diameter was 3.5 cm. Based on tumor pathology, the endoscopic transorbital transcavernous trans-Meckel's cave approach (21 cases) or transorbital anterior transpetrosal approach (11 cases) was selected. The most common complication was facial paresthesia in 4 of 21 patients with trigeminal schwannomas and in 1 of 11 patients with petroclival meningiomas. Diplopia due to fourth cranial nerve injury occurred in 3 of 11 patients with petroclival meningiomas. Postoperative clinical improvement in neuralgic pain was observed in 3 of 4 patients. One patient developed a temporary facial palsy (House-Brackmann grade III) and another patient had transient paraparesis after removal of petroclival meningioma. Endoscopic transorbital surgery appears to be a safe and effective technique for the resection of petroclival lesions, offering excellent visualization and access to the tumor while minimizing morbidity. However, further studies with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up are warranted to validate the long-term efficacy and safety of this approach. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the utility of endoscopic transorbital techniques in skull base surgery.

To investigate the safety of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections in a nationwide population-based study. Although laparoscopic techniques are increasingly used in colorectal cancer surgery, little is known on results outside trials. With the fast introduction of laparoscopic resection (LR), questions were raised about safety. Of all patients who underwent an elective colorectal cancer resection in 2010 in the Netherlands, 93% were included in the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. Short-term outcome after LR, open resection (OR), and converted LR were compared in a generalized linear mixed model. We further explored hospital differences in LR and conversion rates. A total of 7350 patients, treated in 90 hospitals, were included. LR rate was 41% with a conversion rate of 15%. After adjustment for differences in case-mix, LR was associated with a lower risk of mortality (odds ratio 0.63, P < 0.01), major morbidity (odds ratio 0.72, P < 0.01), any complications (odds ratio 0.74, P < 0.01), hospital stay more than 14 days (odds ratio 0.71, P < 0.01), and irradical resections (odds ratio 0.68, P < 0.01), compared to OR. Outcome after conversion was similar to OR (P > 0.05). A large variation in LR and conversion rates among hospitals was found; however, the difference in outcome associated with operative techniques was not influenced by hospital of treatment. Use of laparoscopic techniques in colorectal cancer surgery in the Netherlands is safe and results are better in short-term outcome than open surgery, irrespective of the hospital of treatment. Outcome after conversion was similar to OR.

Endoscopic Management of Large Sessile Colonic Polyps: Getting the Low Down From Down Under

Dilatation and curettage versus lesion resection in the treatment of cesarean-scar-pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis