Abstract

The paper compares the performances of multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) and radial basis function (RBF) networks in detecting clouds in NOAA/AVHRR images. The main results show that the RBF networks are able to handle complex atmospheric and oceanographic phenomena while conventional rule-based systems and MLPs cannot. In particular, the experimental evaluations show that the RBF networks can converge to global minima while the MLPs can only achieve this occasionally, and that classification errors made by the RBF networks decrease dramatically when the number of basis functions increases. In addition, these errors are almost identical when the number of basis functions reaches a threshold. Only on a few rare occasions does the backpropagation algorithm attain an optimal solution and the classification errors made by the MLPs are comparable to (but still larger than) the ones made by the RBF networks. However, the results show that achieving such optimal solutions is difficult. It is, therefore, concluded that the RBF networks are better than the MLPs for cloud detection.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call