Abstract

Abstract Accurate hydrological simulations comply with the water (sixth) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The study investigates the utility of ANN and SVR, as well as the post-simulation bias treatment of these simulations at Swat River basin, Pakistan. For this, climate variables were lag adjusted for the first time, then cross-correlated with the flow to identify the most associative delay time. In sensitivity analysis, seven combinations were selected as input with suitable hyperparameters. For SVR, grid search cross-validation determined the optimal set of hyper-parameters, while for ANN, neurons and hidden layers were optimized by trial and error. We ran model by using optimized hyperparameter configurations and input combinations. In comparison to SVRs (Root mean square error (RMSE) 34.2; mean absolute error (MAE) 3.0; CC 0.91) values, respectively, ANN fits the observations better than SVR with (RMSE 11.9; MAE 1.14; CC 0.99). Linear bias-corrected simulations greatly improved ANN performance (RMSE 3.98; MAE 0.625; CC 0.99), while the improvement was slight in the case of SVR (RMSE 35; MAE 0.58; CC 0.92). On seasonal scale, bias-corrected simulations remedy low- and high-flow seasonal discrepancies. Flow duration analysis results reveal deviation at low- and high-flow conditions by models, which were then reconciled by applying bias corrections.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call