Abstract
In a comparative law perspective there are differences related to the possibility of publishing the dissenting opinions and concurrences that exist inside collegiate courts. Some systems follow a tradition of secrecy, while others follow transparency. This work analyzes the benefits that the dissenting opinion system produces for the political system, studying the role of the judges inside it. It explores the relation between this debate and a perspective of judicial legitimacy based on accountability and less related to the professionalization and hierarchy of the judicature. Te paper proposes a framework for discussing the problem of judicial transparency inside those countries that accept constitutional democracy and judicial review, offering a line of research and opening perspectives for future papers.
Highlights
Tradition of secrecy, while others follow transparency. is work analyzes the bene ts that the dissenting opinion system produces for the political system, studying the role of the judges inside it
It explores the relation between this debate and a perspective of judicial legitimacy based on accountability and less related to the professionalization and hierarchy of the judicature. e paper proposes a framework for discussing the problem of judicial transparency inside those countries that accept constitutional democracy and judicial review, o ering a line of research and opening perspectives for future papers
Entregar las razones equivocadas es entregar todo erróneo, y eso vale una disidencia, aun cuando a esa disidencia se le llame prevención”
Summary
APORTES DEL MODELO DE DISIDENCIAS JUDICIALES AL SISTEMA POLÍTICO. Algunos sistemas siguen una tradición de secretismo, y otros de transparencia. Este trabajo analiza los bene cios que el sistema de disidencias produce para el sistema político, examinando cuál es el rol de los jueces dentro éste. Se explora el vínculo de este debate con una visión de legitimidad judicial basada en el accountability y menos relacionada con la profesionalización y jerarquía de la judicatura. Se propone un marco para discutir el problema de la transparencia judicial dentro de aquellos países que han aceptado la existencia de una democracia (con justicia) constitucional, ofreciendo una línea de investigación y abriendo perspectivas para trabajos futuros. PALABRAS CLAVE: Disidencia – voto particular – justicia constitucional – transparencia judicial – legitimidad judicial.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
