Abstract

Mature landfill leachates are characterized by high levels of ammoniacal nitrogen which must be reduced for discharge in the sewer system and further treatment in municipal wastewater treatment plants. The use of anammox-based processes can allow for an efficient treatment of ammonium-rich leachates. In this work, two real scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs), designed to initially perform partial nitritation/anammox (PN/A) and simultaneous partial nitrification and denitrification (SPND) for the treatment of ammonium-rich urban landfill leachate, were modelled using BioWin 6.0 in order to enable plant-wide modelling and optimizing. The constructed models were calibrated and validated using data from long- and short-term (one cycle) SBR operation and fit well to the main physical-chemical parameters (i.e., ammonium, nitrite and nitrate concentrations) measured during short-term (one cycle) operations. Despite the different strategies in terms of dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations and aeration and mixing patterns applied for SBR operation, the models allowed for understanding that in both reactors the PN/A process was shown as the main contributor to nitrogen removal when the availability of organic carbon was low. Indeed, in both SBRs, the activity of nitrite oxidizing bacteria was inhibited due to high levels of free ammonia, whereas anammox bacteria were active due to the simultaneous presence of ammonium and nitrite and their ability to recover from DO inhibition. Increasing the external carbon addition, a prompt decrease of the anammox biomass was observed, with SPND becoming the main nitrogen removal mechanism. Models were also applied to estimate the production rates of nitrous oxide by aerobic ammonia oxidizing bacteria and heterotrophic denitrifiers. The models were found to be a robust tool for understanding the effects of different operating conditions (i.e, temperature, cycle phases, DO concentration, external carbon addition) on the nitrogen removal performances of the two reactors, assessing the contribution of the different bacterial groups involved.

Highlights

  • Mature landfill leachates are heterogenous liquid streams generally characterized by a low content of biodegradable organic carbon and high concentrations of organic and inorganic contaminants [1]

  • Despite the different strategies in terms of dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations and aeration and mixing patterns applied for sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) operation, the models allowed for understanding that in both reactors the partial nitritation/anammox (PN/A) process was shown as the main contributor to nitrogen removal when the availability of organic carbon was low

  • The present study models the performances of two full-scale SBRs operated with the aim of achieving two different nitrogen removal bioprocesses, i.e., partial nitritation (PN)/A and simultaneous partial nitrification and denitrification (SPND), for the treatment of mature landfill leachate contaminated by high concentrations of ammonium

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mature landfill leachates are heterogenous liquid streams generally characterized by a low content of biodegradable organic carbon and high concentrations of organic and inorganic contaminants [1]. Ammonium-rich landfill leachate must undergo a pretreatment for nitrogen removal before entering the municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Biological processes are less expensive and result in the efficient removal of both nitrogen and organic carbon. Treatment of ammonium-rich landfill leachate by conventional nitrification and denitrification processes requires organic carbon supplementation to satisfy carbon demand for denitrification, as well as a high oxygen supply, resulting in reduced economic advantages and potential secondary pollution [6]. For wastewaters with low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C/N), anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) coupled with nitritation process (i.e., ammonium oxidation to nitrite) is regarded as a more sustainable and cost-effective biological process than conventional nitrification and denitrification [7], due to its lower demand for aeration and organic carbon

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.