Analysis of the effects of visual quality under different light conditions in different intraocular lenses: Study pilot

Abstract

AbstractPurpose: To compare the effects on visual function and quality of life in cataract patients undergoing cataract surgery between different extended depth of focus (EDOF) lenses, when subjected to different illumination conditions.Methods: Observational, prospective, cross‐sectional pilot study with a total of 31 eyes of 15 patients undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery with Tecnis Eyhance, Isopure1.2.3 and Vivity intraocular lenses. All patients underwent a complete preoperative examination. They were also evaluated on different days under mesopic and photopic conditions.Results: Thirty‐one eyes of 15 patients (70.5 ± 8.6) were included in the study. Statistically significant values were obtained when comparing intermediate visual acuity (VA) between mesopic and photopic illumination conditions for the Isopure and Eyhance lenses with a value of 0.021 and the Isopure lens with Vivity with 0.001. In photopic conditions at intermediate distance a significant value was obtained between Vivity and Eyhance with a value of 0.02 and in mesopic conditions at intermediate distance between Vivity and Isopure with a value of 0.001. Between the different lenses, no significant values were obtained between the photopic and mesopic conditions. No significant values were found for pupillometry and halometry in mesopic conditions either.Conclusions: All three intraocular lenses provided excellent distance vision in both photopic and mesopic conditions with no statistically significant differences. But in intermediate distance, significant differences were found between photopic and mesopic conditions between the Isopure lens and the Vivity and Eyhance lenses. Therefore, the Isopure lens has worse intermediate VA values in mesopic than the other lenses. There were also no significant differences in near vision in pupillometry and halometry.