Abstract

Case from PT. Asabri Persero highlighted the important role of BUMN's direction in maintaining company integrity following the principles of Business Judgment Rules (BJR). In the context of BJR, directives have the authority to make business decisions in good faith and rationally, but the case shows alleged violations of integrity and legal compliance by directives, highlighting weaknesses in the company's internal oversight. This research aims to apply the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) in making decisions regarding the direction of BUMN Persero, especially in the context of corruption cases. Normative research methods are used by analyzing legal norms related to BJR and the principles contained therein. The results of the analysis show that the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) in the context of BUMN Persero is important to ensure the sustainability and sustainability of the business. However, in cases of criminal acts of corruption, the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) requires careful adjustments to the principles of transparency, accountability and public interest. In conclusion, the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) in the direction of BUMN Persero's decision-making must be in line with the values ??of integrity and good governance, taking into account the legal consequences that may arise.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.