Abstract
Despite recognising the role of tillage erosion in landforms evolution, little research has documented its effects in prehistoric times. Herein, an interdisciplinary archaeological-geomorphological experiment with reconstructed tillage tools and management was conducted in order to measure tillage erosion when a new field in grasslands was established in the Bronze Age-Iron Age. Three wooden ards were reconstructed based on archaeological findings. They were tested in a cross-tillage experiment, consisting of a tillage pass perpendicular to the primary slope (6.5-9.7%), and a second tillage pass parallel to the primary slope of a convex-convex ridge with mowed grass (0.2 m high, vegetation cover >90%). The standard sole ard proved to be the most effective, with a mean tillage depth of ~0.12 m, a mean tillage speed of 3.8 km h-1, and a mean distance between furrows of 0.20-0.25 m. Only 13% of the 264 tracers placed on 6 transects were displaced, and the mean tracers displacement parallel to the primary slope was 0.04 ± 0.17 m. Contour tillage perpendicular to primary slope created V or U shaped furrows with a mean depth of 0.1-0.12 m, a mean width of 0.05-0.1 m, and incision under the main root zone. Only soil in direct contact with the ard was displaced, with a mean translocation distance of 0.06 ± 0.2 m parallel and 0.06 ± 0.3 m perpendicular to the primary slope. During tillage parallel to slope, soil clods of ~0.20 x 0.25 x 0.10 m were created and slightly disturbed or turned over one another. The tracers moved within the furrows and with the soil clods. Loose soil, resembling a seedbed, was not covered by soil clods. Mean displacement during the second pass was 0.03 ± 0.19 m parallel and 0.00 ± 0.15 m perpendicular to primary slope. The displacement from cross-tillage with a wooden ard in permanent grasslands was lower than many previously measured values of traditional animal-powered metal ploughs in permanent fields. No relationship between mean soil displacement and slope gradient was found. Dense vegetation and root structure influenced ard soil-penetration, its movement within the soil, and the displacement of tracers packed between the roots. Cross-tillage with a wooden ard proved to be insufficient for seedbed preparation. The results suggest that grazing or fire management, followed by repeated tillage with ard or hoe in order to destroy soil clods were necessary to establish a new field in grasslands during the Bronze Age-Iron Age.
Highlights
Tillage –the preparation of soil for seeding and crop cultivation– was one of the primary innovations of the Neolithic, leading to great cultural, technological and sociopolitical changes with global consequences (Lemmen et al, 2011)
Despite evidence that tillage induced landform evolution in the past (Bac, 1928; Follain et al, 2009; Houben 2008, 2012; Nyssen et al, 2014; Smetanová et al, 2015), little is known about the erosivity of pre-historical and historical tillage tools and tillage management strategies
Erosivity of tillage operation is closely connected to the characteristics of tillage tools and tillage management strategy, and differed between recent and pre-historical tillage instruments
Summary
Tillage –the preparation of soil for seeding and crop cultivation– was one of the primary innovations of the Neolithic, leading to great cultural, technological and sociopolitical changes with global consequences (Lemmen et al, 2011). Despite evidence that tillage induced landform evolution in the past (Bac, 1928; Follain et al, 2009; Houben 2008, 2012; Nyssen et al, 2014; Smetanová et al, 2015), little is known about the erosivity of pre-historical and historical tillage tools and tillage management strategies. Erosivity of tillage operation is closely connected to the characteristics of tillage tools (shape, width, length, etc.) and tillage management strategy (tillage depth, speed, tillage direction; Lobb et al, 1999), and differed between recent and pre-historical tillage instruments. Numerous archaeological reconstructions of tillage tools were conducted to test various archaeological hypotheses, e.g. shoe adze (Quente, 1914; Brentjes, 1956; Henning, 1965), ards (Aberg and Bowen, 1960; Hansen, 1969; Semjonov, 1974; Reynolds 1979, 1988; Lüning et al, 1980; Podborský, Ox drawn (2)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.