Abstract
The use of technology blurred the borders between classroom learning and online platform as a blended design. This design is appropriately applied in higher education in the fourth industrial revolution era. The study aimed to investigate the progression of undergraduate students' metacognition of blended learning and their achievement in the environmental chemistry course. The study employed a quantitative method. The quantitative method used a quasi-experiment research method. A non-equivalent post-tests group control design was applied. The population was fifty-nine students who enrolled in the environmental chemistry course in the chemistry education department at one of the public universities in Indonesia. Twenty-nine students were randomly selected for experimental class and thirty students in the control class. The experimental class experienced the blended learning environment, while the control class had conventional learning. At the end of the course, both classes measured their metacognition using the Testlet instrument. The Testlet instrument can measure students' cognitive achievement in environmental chemistry courses, also students' metacognition. There is different progress regarding students' metacognition between two groups. However, students' cognitive achievement showed the same trend. This gap is caused by various factors, such as a difference in learning experience and unpreparedness of students in blended learning.
Highlights
In this fourth era of the industrial revolution, everyone can access technology better, including generation Z which was born from 1995-2010 [1]
This study explores two research questions, based on the explanation above: (1) Is there any significant difference in the students' metacognition between experimental and control class? (2) In what extent are the differences in students’ metacognition between two classes?
Normality test is essential before statistical analysis [20]. It showed when a data is normally distributed or not. This type of test is carried out using SPSS software's test such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilk, Lilliefors, Chi-Square, and JarqueBera[21]
Summary
In this fourth era of the industrial revolution, everyone can access technology better, including generation Z which was born from 1995-2010 [1]. They were generally characterized by high technological ability [2] and will start taking over various sectors of employment in the few years. Generation Z has obtained a decent education and technical abilities which require the participation of teachers to create advance learning conditions. Students, especially education majors, must be familiar with technology-based training, can be called as blended design. It supports both the fourth industrial revolution and 21st century learning techniques. The advantages of blended design in iJET ‒ Vol 15, No 21, 2020
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.