Abstract

High-precision navigation and positioning technology for indoor areas has become one of the research hotspots in the current navigation field. However, due to the complexity of the indoor environment, this technology direction is also one of the research difficulties. At present, our common indoor positioning methods are WIFI, Bluetooth, LED, ultrasound and pseudo satellite. However, due to the problem of inaccurate direct or indirect ranging, the positioning accuracy is usually affected, which makes the final application difficult to achieve. In order to avoid the ranging limitations of the existing methods, a new dual-frequency entanglement constraint (DFEC) ranging method based on homologous base station is proposed in this paper. The relationship between the homologous characteristics of dual-frequency signals and the phase relationship within the cycle is used to estimate the current carrier phase adjustment the true value of the cycle count is used to get rid of the constraints of the ranging conditions and improve the ranging accuracy. In order to verify the feasibility of this method, the wired environment test and the typical characteristic points of wireless environment are tested and analyzed respectively. The analysis results show that in the wired environment, the transmitting base station and the receiving terminal will introduce a ranging error of one wavelength; in the wireless environment, due to the influence of spatial noise and multipath, the error of the estimation of the whole cycles of the ranging value increases significantly. And this phenomenon is most obvious especially in the region where the signal is shaded, but the error estimate that satisfies ± 1 wavelength still accounts for 90%. Based on this, we conduct multiple observation data collection at five typical feature points, and used existing MATLAB positioning algorithms to conduct positioning error tests. The analysis found that under this error condition, the positioning accuracy was about 0.6 m, and 93% of the points met the 1-m positioning accuracy.

Highlights

  • Indoor navigation and positioning technology can be understood as the use of various technical means to achieve the positioning and tracking of people and objects in indoor spaces

  • The previous positioning methods are roughly divided into three categories: sensor positioning based on recursive navigation, positioning based on feature point matching, and positioning based on base station signal ranging

  • Analysis is within ± 0.01 cycles, and that the ranging error based on the entire wavelength count estimate of the Through the above analysis, we can conclude that the maximum carrier phase difference ranging error meets a probability of 90% within ± 1 cycle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Indoor navigation and positioning technology can be understood as the use of various technical means to achieve the positioning and tracking of people and objects in indoor spaces. In the research process of Wuhan University, by constructing an indoor RTK method, using the method of UKF and known initial points to estimate the ambiguity of whole cycles and improve the ranging accuracy to achieve positioning, but in actual tests, this method is only suitable for simple indoors. We have designed two positioning algorithms, an innovative fingerprint location algorithm [20] and the doppler positioning algorithms with known initial points [21] These methods can currently achieve indoor positioning services at the centimeter level by avoiding real-time raw ranging value. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: introduces the working of the dual-frequency multi-channel signal base station Section and describes the ranging processprinciple in detail. Technical advantages of the current method and give the follow-up research directions

Overview
Proposed Method
Cumulative Over-The-Cycle Detection
Frequency Selection Analysis
Implementations and Evaluation
Wired Connection Test
Test Results of Switching Pseudolite Base Station
Cold Start Receiving Terminal Test
Test results of switching pseudolite base station
Phase differencebetween between L1
0.465 Introduction
Results of Wireless Environmental Testing
Positioning
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call