Abstract
This study aims to identify patterns in user complaints within chat transcripts before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The researchers analyzed 3,339 chat transcripts from an academic chat reference consortium between January 2019 to December 2021. Transcripts were hand-coded for pandemic status, semester, user type, presence of a complaint, complaint type and subtype, and complaint resolution. We tested the significance of relationships between variables using Pearson’s chi-square test of independence and Fisher’s exact test. Over the three-year study period, 17.6% of chats contained at least one complaint, with faculty and graduate students complaining more than expected, and undergraduates complaining less than expected. The most common complaint types concerned e-resources, accounts, and research. There were significant differences in complaints according to user type: students and faculty complained more about e-resources, staff and alumni complained more about accounts, and members of the public complained more about policies. The researchers found a statistically significant increase in complaints during the pandemic, with more complaints about document delivery and borrowing and e-access eligibility than expected, and fewer complaints about library accounts and noise than expected. Most complaints across the study period were resolved, typically via referral.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call