Abstract
The purpose of this study is to reevaluate the rules of passivization in school grammar and offer an alternative analysis of passive constructions using a backup approach. Traditional school grammar analyzes sentences based on basic elements such as Subject and Verb, employing six passivization rules: (1) be + pp, (2) will + be + pp, (3) be + being + pp, (4) have + been + pp, (5) will + have + been + pp, and (6) had + been + pp. This study introduces an alternative syntactic structure consisting of six fundamental elements: Comp, Tense, Neg, Link, Aspect, and Predicate. This framework allows for the analysis of passive constructions through a backup approach. When active voice sentences are transformed into passive voice, they lose grammatical information. The passive voice compensates for this loss by incorporating backup in Tense, Link, or Aspect. The alternative framework offers a better analysis of passivization in three respects. Firstly, it does not rely on the traditional passivization rules. Secondly, it eliminates the need for rote memorization associated with traditional grammar. Thirdly, it provides a principled account of passivization using a backup approach.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
