Abstract
This case, set in the high plateau of the Texas Panhandle, covers the years 1998-2004. The focus is on voting rights. The Amarillo board members, like board members in most Texas districts, were elected at large. Faced with a voting rights lawsuit filed by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the League of United Latin American Citizens, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, they opted for cumulative voting rather than creating single-member districts. The case shows how the board maintained unity and avoided ethnic discord by accepting a compromise. Many districts in areas with growing Hispanic populations have or will face voting rights lawsuits. This case sheds light on this challenge and offers an option that most boards may not otherwise consider.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
