Abstract
The current status of the liquidated damages clause in Chile is developed. The sources that influenced the consecration of this institution in the Chilean Civil code, Spanish law and French law during the codifying period of the 19th century are also analyzed. The liquidated damages clause is characterized as an accessory convention, conditional and predetermined and conventional estimation of the damages by the parties. It is a clause that is considered classifiable in compensatory and moratorium, with a possible third option of classification, in case the parties agree for it to be a penalty clause. The paper also exposes the possibility of accumulation of compliance with the obligation and the penalty as compensation, as well as the possibility of accumulating a moratorium penalty and a compensatory penalty. The requirements demanded for the execution of a liquidated damages clause are presented and analyzed: being a conventional and predetermined estimation of the damages, the constituent elements of contractual responsibility must be fulfilled. Therefore, there must be a breach of contract, inexcusable imputability, constitution in default, damage and causation. It is emphasized that for the constitution in default, in compliance with a liquidated damages clause, judicial interpellation is necessary, that is, the valid notification of the claim. Finally, the rules on the burden of proof and the need to prove each of the elements of contractual responsibility in this institution are developed.
Highlights
Se desarrolla el estado actual de la cláusula penal en Chile
The sources that influenced the consecration of this institution in the Chilean Civil code
The liquidated damages clause is characterized as an accessory convention
Summary
El legislador francés trata de las cláusulas penales dentro del derecho de los contratos. Se desprenden dos conclusiones, la primera es que requiere de la constitución en mora del deudor, y la segunda, al igual que en nuestro derecho, afirma positivamente que el acreedor tendrá derecho para elegir por un lado la aplicación de las normas generales sobre responsabilidad contractual respecto de la obligación principal que el deudor se encuentra en mora de cumplir, o bien, por otro lado, optar por exigir la pena accesoria. Se explica por cuanto la cláusula penal corresponde a la indemnización de perjuicios a que tiene derecho el acreedor de la obligación principal en caso de incumplimiento por parte de su deudor. Esta sería una excepción sólo aparente, ya que el daño por el cumplimiento tardío y el daño por el incumplimiento son del todo diferentes y así se encuentran reconocidos dentro de las normas generales de responsabilidad contractual
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have