Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 50 P/HUM/2018 Terhadap Syarat Pengangkatan Notaris

Abstract

The issues raised in this article are first, examination on the reasons for the Minister of Law and Human Rights to issue a Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 25 of 2017 on the Notary Appointment Examination; second, review on the Supreme Court's consideration in canceling the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 25 of 2007 on the Notary Appointment Examination; and third, review on the juridical implications of the Supreme Court's decision Number 50 P/HUM/2018 on the Notary Appointment Examination. This is a normative legal research which is analyzed using a qualitative descriptive method. The results of this study conclude that first, the Minister of Law and Human Rights received a report from the Notary Honorary Council regarding the number of summons to Notaries and requests for minute of the deed by the police, hence a Notary Appointment Examination is required. Second, the Supreme Court canceled the Notary Appointment Examination due to the requirements for passing the Notary Appointment Examination were contrary to higher laws and regulations. Third, the Minister of Law and Human Rights revoked the provisions regarding the Notary Appointment Examination and replaced it with another mechanism, namely Notary Quality Improvement Training (PPKJN)