Abstract

Bats are the natural reservoir host for a number of zoonotic viruses, including Hendra virus (HeV) which causes severe clinical disease in humans and other susceptible hosts. Our understanding of the ability of bats to avoid clinical disease following infection with viruses such as HeV has come predominantly from in vitro studies focusing on innate immunity. Information on the early host response to infection in vivo is lacking and there is no comparative data on responses in bats compared with animals that succumb to disease. In this study, we examined the sites of HeV replication and the immune response of infected Australian black flying foxes and ferrets at 12, 36 and 60 hours post exposure (hpe). Viral antigen was detected at 60 hpe in bats and was confined to the lungs whereas in ferrets there was evidence of widespread viral RNA and antigen by 60 hpe. The mRNA expression of IFNs revealed antagonism of type I and III IFNs and a significant increase in the chemokine, CXCL10, in bat lung and spleen following infection. In ferrets, there was an increase in the transcription of IFN in the spleen following infection. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) on lung tissue from bats and ferrets was performed at 0 and 60 hpe to obtain a global overview of viral and host protein expression. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of immune pathways revealed that six pathways, including a number involved in cell mediated immunity were more likely to be upregulated in bat lung compared to ferrets. GO analysis also revealed enrichment of the type I IFN signaling pathway in bats and ferrets. This study contributes important comparative data on differences in the dissemination of HeV and the first to provide comparative data on the activation of immune pathways in bats and ferrets in vivo following infection.

Highlights

  • Bats have attracted increasing attention since being recognized as the source of numerous emerging and re-emerging viruses, including some that are highly pathogenic to other mammals

  • Among the viruses that bats coexist with in the absence of disease are the henipaviruses; Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV) which are carried by flying foxes (Pteropus spp.) [4,5,6,7]

  • Henipavirus infections in humans are characterized by an influenza-like illness that may progress to pneumonia and encephalitis with mortality rates of between 50–100% [11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bats have attracted increasing attention since being recognized as the source of numerous emerging and re-emerging viruses, including some that are highly pathogenic to other mammals. With the exception of the rhabdoviruses; rabies and lyssaviruses and the arenavirus; Tacaribe virus, bats develop no clinical signs of disease despite the presence of virus in tissues [1,2,3]. Among the viruses that bats coexist with in the absence of disease are the henipaviruses; Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV) which are carried by flying foxes (Pteropus spp.) [4,5,6,7]. Spillover of HeV from flying foxes to horses and into humans has occurred regularly since 1994, with 94 horse cases and seven human cases reported to 2015 and spillover events continuing to be recorded annually [8,9]. A similar situation exists for the Malaysian strain of the closely related NiV, which has been reported to spillover from bats into pigs and subsequently into humans. Henipavirus infections in humans are characterized by an influenza-like illness that may progress to pneumonia and encephalitis with mortality rates of between 50–100% [11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.