Activity of tongue muscles during respiration: it takes a village?

Abstract

INVITED EDITORIALActivity of tongue muscles during respiration: it takes a village?Alan J. SokoloffAlan J. SokoloffDepartment of Physiology Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta, Georgia 30322 E-mail: Published Online:01 Feb 2004https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01079.2003MoreSectionsPDF (20 KB)Download PDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations Almost twenty years have passed since the muscular hydrostat theory of tongue function was set forth (7). Yet few studies have explored one of its central predictions: that “extrinsic” tongue muscles (muscles with origin outside the tongue body) and “intrinsic” tongue muscles (muscles with both origin and insertion in the tongue body) must be coactive in most tongue movements. An exclusive focus on extrinsic tongue muscles is especially notable in studies of tongue movement during respiration for which a single tongue “protrusor” muscle, the genioglossus, commonly serves as the indicator of respiratory drive to the entire tongue. That the situation is substantially more complex is evident from the accompanying study of Bailey and Fregosi (2). The authors demonstrate, in an in vivo rat model, that at least one intrinsic tongue muscle, the superior longitudinal, can be coactive with the extrinsic tongue muscle hyoglossus during respiration. This study thus serves to caution against approaches that reduce tongue movement to functionally discrete extrinsic and intrinsic muscle components, as well as approaches that investigate the neuromuscular control of the tongue in respiration by isolated study of the genioglossus muscle.The mammal tongue is undeniably complex. Seven or eight tongue muscles, each with extensive terminations in the tongue body, are variously described. In the rat, over 3,000 motor units comprise the muscles of one side of the tongue alone. Tongue muscles are typically categorized according to morphology (i.e., extrinsic versus intrinsic) or to presumed function (i.e., protrusor versus retrusor), and these categorizations form the basis for virtually all studies of the tongue motor system, from cellular to systems levels of investigation. Yet morphologic and kinematic evidence suggests that neither categorization scheme is functionally based or even heuristic. Extrinsic and intrinsic muscles share overlapping courses in the tongue body (1). Thus, with the exception of the extralingual portion of extrinsic muscles, the mechanical effects of many extrinsic and intrinsic muscle fibers are likely similar, not disparate. The same may be said for some protrusor and retrusor muscles (3). Additionally, movements of the mammal tongue are not restricted to the protrusion-retrusion axis but involve complex changes of tongue shape in three dimensions. These changes include the simultaneous lengthening and shortening of different tongue regions (6), a behavior clearly incompatible with a simple protrusion-retrusion model of tongue function.A conceptual basis for approaching the morphological and kinematic complexity of the mammal tongue is provided by the muscular hydrostat model of tongue function. In this model, the tongue is defined as a constant-volume structure, and tongue movement is thought to be produced by change in tongue body shape (7). Tongue protrusion, for example, is produced by a decrease in the cross-sectional area of the tongue body. The muscular hydrostat model is at its core democratic. The activation of any motor unit with tongue body presence can influence tongue shape and hence tongue movement. Because muscle fiber orientations vary with tongue shape, the mechanical effect of a motor unit (or entire muscle) is dependent on the integrated activity of all other tongue motor units. Multiple muscles work in concert to provide both the structural support and the active force for tongue movement.These considerations lead to predictions of tongue muscle activity that are contrary to predictions based on traditional schemes of muscle categorization. According to the muscular hydrostat model, protrusor and retrusor coactivation, as well as extrinsic and intrinsic coactivation, should occur in most tongue movements (8). Studies of the extralingual portions of extrinsic tongue muscles, accessible to in vivo electromyographic (EMG) study, have indeed demonstrated that protrusor and retrusor muscles are coactive in respiration (4). But, for most tongue movements, the business end is the tongue body, and here muscle interdigitation limits EMG assessment of individual muscle activity. In the accompanying article, Bailey and Fregosi (2) make clever use of rat tongue anatomy to functionally isolate a single intrinsic tongue muscle, the superior longitudinal, and compare its EMG activity with that of an extrinsic tongue muscle, the hyoglossus, during respiration. Their findings are striking. In the vagus-intact preparation, the hyoglossus is always active, and the superior longitudinal is sometimes active, during normal respiration. At high levels of hypercapnia the hyoglossus and superior longitudinal are always coactive. In the vagotomized preparation, hyoglossus-superior longitudinal coactivation occurs under both normal and hypercapnic conditions. Extrinsic-intrinsic coactivation is thus present during respiration in the rat, and this coactivation is facultative, not obligate. The study of Bailey and Fregosi, in confirming a primary prediction of the muscular hydrostat model, suggests that this model applies to tongue movements in normal breathing and breathing-related disorders such as sleep apnea.Multiple tongue muscles are thus coactive in many tongue movements, including movements during respiration (2, 4), but these patterns of coactivation are not explained by traditional muscle categorizations. What strategies of neuromuscular activation then explain observed muscle activity patterns? I suggest that the answer to this question requires the in vivo investigation of individual motor units sampled from multiple tongue muscles and will not be obtained from muscle-level investigations. Heterogeneous behavior is expressed by tongue motor units. In the human genioglossus muscle, for example, at least two populations of motor units are present, one population selected into activity during inspiration and expiration and another population selected into activity only during inspiration (10). The neural basis for the selective activation of tongue motor units is not known. Tongue motor units vary with respect to physiological properties (5, 9) and are likely localized to specific regions of tongue muscles (9). It is thus possible that heterogeneous activation of motor units represents a strategy directed within individual tongue muscles to select motor units that share similar properties (e.g., fatigability, speed of contraction, location). But it is equally plausible that selection strategies are directed across muscles to activate motor units from multiple muscles that in concert produce a specific tongue movement (e.g., tongue protrusion). In this scheme, motor units, and not muscles, are the output elements of the tongue motor system. I suggest that cross-muscle strategies are crucial for controlling tongue shape, position, and stiffness so that important behaviors such as breathing, swallowing, feeding, and speech are enacted with maximal mechanical and metabolic efficiency. Moreover, a loss of cross-muscle control of the tongue may initiate or exacerbate conditions such as obstructive sleep apnea; this also underscores the need to focus study on the entire “tongue musculature” as opposed to the activity of only one (e.g., the genioglossus) of the many intrinsic and extrinsic tongue muscles. References 1 Abd-El Malek S. A contribution to the study of the movements of the tongue in animals with special reference to the cat. J Anat 73: 15-33, 1938.PubMed | Google Scholar2 Bailey EF and Fregosi RF. Coordination of intrinsic and extrinsic tongue muscles during spontaneous breathing in the rat. J Appl Physiol 96: 440-449, 2004.Link | ISI | Google Scholar3 Dabelow R. Vorstudien zu einer Betrachtung der Zunge also funktionelles System. Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrbuch 91: 33-76, 1951.Google Scholar4 Fuller DD, Williams JS, Jansen PL, and Fregosi RF. Effect of co-activation of tongue protrudor and retractor muscles on tongue movements and pharyngeal airflow mechanics in the rat. J Physiol 519: 601-613, 1999Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar5 Gilliam E and Goldberg SJ. Contractile properties of the tongue muscles: effects of hypoglossal nerve and extracellular motoneuron stimulation in rat. J Neurophysiol 74: 547-555, 1995Link | ISI | Google Scholar6 Hiiemae K and Crompton AW. Mastication, food transport and swallowing. In: Functional Vertebrate Morphology, edited by Hildebrand M. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1985, p. 262-290.Google Scholar7 Kier WM and Smith KK. Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular-hydrostats. Zool J Linn Soc 83: 307-324, 1985.Crossref | ISI | Google Scholar8 Smith KK and Kier WM Trunks, tongues and tentacles: moving with skeletons of muscle. Am Sci 77: 29-35, 1989ISI | Google Scholar9 Sokoloff AJ. Localization and contractile properties of intrinsic longitudinal motor units of the rat tongue. J Neurophysiol 84: 827-835, 2000.Link | ISI | Google Scholar10 Tsuiki S, Ono T, Ishiwata Y, and Kuroda T. Functional divergence of human genioglossus motor units with respiratory-related activity. Eur Respir J 15: 906-910, 2000.Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar Download PDF Previous Back to Top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation Cited ByEffects of inhaled fluticasone propionate on extrinsic tongue muscles in ratsChristopher Setzke, Oleg Broytman, John A. Russell, Natalie Morel, Michelle Sonsalla, Dudley W. Lamming, Nadine P. Connor, and Mihaela Teodorescu13 March 2020 | Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 128, No. 3A review of the approaches to predict the ease of swallowing and post-swallow residuesTrends in Food Science & Technology, Vol. 86Age-Related Differences in Pressures Generated During Isometric Presses and Swallows by Healthy Adults2 November 2015 | Dysphagia, Vol. 31, No. 1Internal Kinematics of the Volume-Reduced Tongue: A Longitudinal Microsonometric Study14 November 2015 | The Anatomical Record, Vol. 299, No. 1Effect of unilateral nasal obstruction on tongue protrusion forces in growing ratsKarin Harumi Uchima Koecklin, Chiho Kato, Yukiha Funaki, Maya Hiranuma, Takayoshi Ishida, Koichi Fujita, Tadachika Yabushita, Satoshi Kokai, and Takashi Ono1 May 2015 | Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 118, No. 9Development of a computational biomechanical model of the human upper-airway soft-tissues toward simulating obstructive sleep apnea24 September 2013 | Clinical Anatomy, Vol. 27, No. 2Respiration-related discharge of hyoglossus muscle motor units in the ratGregory L. Powell, Amber Rice, Seres J. Bennett-Cross, and Ralph F. Fregosi15 January 2014 | Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 111, No. 2Alternative Therapies for Obstructive Sleep ApneaSleep Medicine Clinics, Vol. 8, No. 4Tongue Anatomy and Physiology, the Scientific Basis for a Novel Targeted Neurostimulation System Designed for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep ApneaNeuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, Vol. 16, No. 4Oral Cavity16 February 2012Specificity of Training in the Lingual MusculatureJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 55, No. 2Tongue Muscle Response to Neuromuscular Diseases and Specific Pathologies9 August 2012Activities of human genioglossus motor unitsRespiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, Vol. 179, No. 1The effects of mouthpiece use on gas exchange parameters during steady-state exercise in college-aged men and womenThe Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 142, No. 9Age-related changes in the hyoepiglottic ligament: functional implications based on histopathologic studyAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology, Vol. 31, No. 6Is the pharynx a muscular hydrostat?Medical Hypotheses, Vol. 74, No. 3Internal kinematics of the tongue in relation to muscle activity and jaw movement in the pigJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, Vol. 36, No. 9Electromyographic activity at the base and tip of the tongue across sleep–wake states in ratsRespiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, Vol. 167, No. 3Internal Kinematics of the Tongue During Feeding in Pigs1 January 2007 | The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 290, No. 10Roles of intrinsic and extrinsic tongue muscles in feeding: Electromyographic study in pigsArchives of Oral Biology, Vol. 52, No. 8Adaptations of the cetacean hyolingual apparatus for aquatic feeding and thermoregulation1 January 2007 | The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 290, No. 6Classification of muscle spindle afferents innervating the masseter muscle in ratsArchives of Oral Biology, Vol. 51, No. 9Respiratory-related Discharge of Genioglossus Muscle Motor UnitsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 172, No. 10PO 2 -dependent Changes in Intrinsic and Extrinsic Tongue Muscle Activities in the RatAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 171, No. 12 More from this issue > Volume 96Issue 2February 2004Pages 438-439 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2004 the American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01079.2003PubMed14715675History Published online 1 February 2004 Published in print 1 February 2004 Metrics