Abstract

In order to reduce the specific ON resistance ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{R}_{\mathbf {{ \mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle ON}},sp}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> ) of power device in the drift region, the folded accumulation lateral double-diffused MOSFET (FALDMOS) is manufactured and analyzed in this article. The drift region of the FALDMOS is etched to form the folded surface, which is similar to the FinFET structure. The oxide inside the trench optimizes the electric field in the drift region, so the doping concentration can be increased while maintaining the breakdown voltage (BV). In addition, the trench increases the area of the drift region covered by the extended gate electrode, which can introduce more accumulated electrons when the device is turned on. The increased doping concentration and accumulated electrons work together to substantially increase the conductivity of the drift region, thereby obtaining ultralow <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{R}_{ \mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle ON},sp}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> . Furthermore, the folded accumulation LDMOS with split gate (FSLDMOS) is proposed to solve the phenomenon that the BV of the FALDMOS cannot be improved by increasing the drift length with the fixed oxide thickness. The polysilicon above the drift region is etched apart to form an extended gate and a split electrode. The electric field concentration near the drain can be alleviated by adjusting the bias on the split electrode. The FALDMOS and FSLDMOS are manufactured by the 0.35- <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu \text{m}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> BCD technology and the key processes, such as trench etching and polysilicon filling, are shown. The experimental results show that <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{R}_{ \mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle ON},sp}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> of the FALDMOS is only 9.3 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{m}\Omega \cdot $ </tex-math></inline-formula> mm2, while that the conventional LDMOS is 36.2 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{m}\Omega \cdot $ </tex-math></inline-formula> mm2, which is reduced by 74.3% with the same BV of 36 V. Moreover, the current density of FALDMOS is five times higher than that of the conventional LDMOS in the same areas. The BV of the FSLDMOS is improved by 66% compared with FALDMOS.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call