Abstract
Numerical simulations of components subjected to cyclic thermo-mechanical loads require an accurate modelling of their cyclic plasticity behaviour. Combined models permit to capture monotonic hardening as well as cyclic hardening/softening phenomena, that occur in reality. In principle the durability assessment of a component under thermal loads can be performed only if the cyclic behaviour is simulated until complete material stabilization. As materials stabilize approximately at half the number of cycles to failure, it follows that in case of small plastic strains a huge number of cycles must be considered and an unfeasible simulation time would be required. Accelerated models have thus been proposed in literature. The aim of this work is that of comparing the different acceleration techniques in the case a round mould for continuous casting loaded thermo-mechanically. It can be observed that the usual approach of using the stabilized stress-strain curve already from the first cycle could lead to relevant errors. An alternative method is that of increasing the value of the parameter that controls the speed of stabilization in the combined model. This approach permits the number of cycles to reach stabilization to be drastically reduced, without affecting the overall mechanical behaviour. Based on this approach, a simple design rule, that can be adopted, particularly when relatively small plastic strains occur, is finally proposed.
Highlights
The choice of a suitable cyclic plasticity model to be used in numerical simulation of components subjected to cyclic thermo-mechanical loads is a crucial aspect in design
In principle the durability assessment of a component under thermal loads can be performed only if the cyclic behaviour is simulated until complete material stabilization
As materials stabilize approximately at half the number of cycles to failure, it follows that in case of small plastic strains a huge number of cycles must be considered and an unfeasible simulation time would be required
Summary
The choice of a suitable cyclic plasticity model to be used in numerical simulation of components subjected to cyclic thermo-mechanical loads is a crucial aspect in design. Since the geometry of the squared mould requires a 3D finite element (FE) simulation, even taking into account symmetries and optimizing the mesh, ≈15 min is needed to compute 1 cycle or ≈630 day to obtain final results, according to the value (b≈4) of the speed of stabilization of the mould alloy, see Fig. 1. To overcome this problem, some alternative models (accelerated, stabilized), proposed in [6], have been adopted and compared. The yield surface can be represented as [7]:
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have