Abstract
ABSTRACT In Academic Barbarism, Michael O’Sullivan coins the eponymous term and analyzes its diverse manifestations. He believes that the notion is worthy of more attention both in academia and beyond. This essay examines Nabokov’s Pnin and Qian’s Fortress Besieged in light of Michel Henry’s theory of barbarism as suppression of life. The essay unfolds around three essential questions in academia that concern both authors: the intrusion of the power structure of society into academia; the rampant scientism in academia; and academics’ blind faith in pedagogy. I argue that, writing some sixty years ago, Nabokov and Qian were already aware of the multiple educational problems that beset academia, thus qualifying them as prophets of the academic barbarism that is looming large on the horizon of today’s higher education.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
