Abstract
Introduction: Smoking doubles the risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and has been associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with myocardial infarction and heart failure. We investigated the association of smoking and mortality in AIS patients in Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke. Methods: We analyzed all AIS patients (n=899,295) without a prior history of CAD from 04/2003-10/2012 in GWTG-Stroke. Categorical data were analyzed by Pearson Chi-square and continuous data by Wilcoxon test. Multivariable models with generalized estimating equations for in-hospital clustering were used to estimate odds ratios of in-hospital mortality. All significant predictors on univariate analysis were included in the multivariable model. Results: Among all AIS patients, 20% were current smokers, defined as any cigarette use in the past year. Smokers were substantially younger (13 years), more often male, with fewer vascular risk factors and comorbid conditions. When recorded, median NIHSS was lower. Smokers were more likely to be admitted to large, academic hospitals, and more often in the South and Midwest. Both groups received a similar frequency of evidence based in-hospital interventions. In-hospital mortality was lower amongst smokers (Table 1). The significant univariate mortality difference attenuated dramatically after adjusting for age and other covariates in the multivariable model, OR increased from 0.56 (0.54, 0.58) on univariate analysis to 0.87 (0.84, 0.91) on multivariable model. Other independent predictors of mortality were increasing age [1.10 (1.08, 1.11) per 10 yr], male gender [1.17 (1.14 - 1.20)], white race [1.18 (1.14 - 1.23)], higher initial NIHSS [1.13 (1.12 - 1.13) per point], atrial fibrillation [1.29 (1.25 - 1.33)], PVD [1.15 (1.08 - 1.23)] and DM [1.12 (1.09 - 1.16)]. Conclusion: Smoking continues to be a major risk factor for presenting with acute ischemic stroke at a much younger age and with fewer vascular risk factors. The association with lower in-hospital mortality, even after covariate adjustment, may represent residual confounding due to the marked age differences and unmeasured confounding or it may reflect a protective association. Further research is warranted.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.