Abstract

Introduction: Despite evidence of smoking as a potent risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD), there have been reports of lower in-hospital mortality among smokers hospitalized for CAD events. Method: We analyzed all consecutive CAD admissions (n=158,054) without a prior history of Stroke/TIA from 2002-2008 in Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-CAD. Categorical data were analyzed by Pearson Chi-square and continuous data by Wilcoxon test. Multivariable models with generalized estimating equations for in-hospital clustering were used to estimate odds ratios of in-hospital mortality. All significant predictors on univariate analysis were included in the multivariable model. Results: Among all CAD patients, 30.4% were current smokers, defined as any cigarette use in the past year. Smokers were substantially younger (12 years), more often male and less often had pre-existing hypertension, dyslipidemia, heart failure, renal failure and atrial fibrillation, and more often had COPD/Asthma. Smokers were more likely to be admitted to large, academic hospitals, and more often in the South. Smokers had shorter length of stay in hospital and were more often discharged home. In-hospital mortality was lower in smokers as compared to non-smokers (Table 1). The significant univariate mortality difference attenuated dramatically after adjusting for age and other covariates in the multivariable model, OR increased from 0.57 (0.53, 0.61) on univariate analysis to 0.88 (0.81, 0.95) on multivariable model. Other independent predictors of mortality were increasing age [1.51 (1.46, 1.56)], history of diabetes mellitus [1.25 (1.18, 1.33)], Asthma/COPD [1.30 (1.23, 1.38)], peripheral vascular disease [1.34 (1.24, 1.44)], heart failure [1.48 (1.38, 1.58)] and renal insufficiency [1.61 (1.48, 1.74)]. Conclusion: Smoking continues to be a major risk factor for presenting with CAD at a much younger age and with fewer risk factors. It is likely that the continued modest association with lower in-hospital mortality in smokers in this analysis after adjustment reflects residual or unmeasured confounding. This apparent smoker’s paradox in CAD should not be interpreted as a benefit of cigarette smoking.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.