Abstract
ABSTRACT The speaker of Duino Elegies treats time as a threat to its sense of situatedness and privacy; a threat that taints all its modes of inhabiting and surviving in the world. This essay argues that Rilke’s foremost task in Elegies is to expose every aspect of subjectivity to such a threat. Arguing against the phenomenological readings of Rilke, that continue to misread the ‘open’-ness in his work as a non-dualist or an antediluvian gesture, this essay contends that the Rilkean ‘open’ is not a counterpoint to our everyday habitus nor does it untether the subject from its finite conditions of time and space, rather it creates a radical, and literary, necessity for finitude. The elegy form, with its traditional emphasis on loss and rehabilitation through memory and poetic authority, is refashioned by Rilke to a degree where what is lost is never allowed a birth into presence either in consciousness or in language. Drawing upon Derrida’s critique of Husserl, the essay argues that Rilke’s work is at its most singular precisely when it searches for a place within time and not despite it.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.