Abstract

A volume penalization method for imposing homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions in advection–diffusion equations is presented. Thus complex geometries which even may vary in time can be treated efficiently using discretizations on a Cartesian grid. A mathematical analysis of the method is conducted first for the one-dimensional heat equation which yields estimates of the penalization error. The results are then confirmed numerically in one and two space dimensions. Simulations of two-dimensional incompressible flows with passive scalars using a classical Fourier pseudo-spectral method validate the approach for moving obstacles. The potential of the method for real world applications is illustrated by simulating a simplified dynamical mixer where for the fluid flow and the scalar transport no-slip and no-flux boundary conditions are imposed, respectively.

Highlights

  • Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in complex geometries which may vary in time, a problem typically encountered in fluid–structure interaction problems, is still a major challenge and requires advanced numerical techniques

  • There exists a large variety of immersed boundary methods, for example Lagrangian multipliers [5], level-set methods [6], fictitious domain approaches and surface [7] and volume penalization approaches [8]

  • In this part we present numerical simulations of flow with passive scalar in a simplified dynamical mixing device

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in complex geometries which may vary in time, a problem typically encountered in fluid–structure interaction problems, is still a major challenge and requires advanced numerical techniques. See, e.g., [1], yield a well adapted discretization for a given geometry. For time varying geometries the grid generation becomes even more complex and for instance elliptic grid generation techniques [2,3] are necessary which further increase the computational effort. During the last decades immersed boundary methods gained ground and became an attractive alternative. There exists a large variety of immersed boundary methods, for example Lagrangian multipliers [5], level-set methods [6], fictitious domain approaches and surface [7] and volume penalization approaches [8]. For reviews we refer the reader to [9,10]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.