Abstract

Understanding the public by analysing the wants, interests and expectations regarding their involvement in archaeology is one of the strategic aims of Europae Archaeologiae Consilium (EAC). Cultural heritage has been the topic of several public opinion polls in Poland over the past few years. In 2011 and 2015, the Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa (National Institute of Cultural Heritage) carried out two representative surveys. Subsequent polls focusing on more specific issues or groups of respondents were undertaken in 2015, 2017 and 2018. Other data from Poland come from the 2017 Special Eurobarometer survey on cultural heritage. They can be contrasted with archaeology-orientated opinion polls: a Europe-wide survey carried out within the NEARCH project led by Inrap (French National Institute for Preventive Archaeological Research) and several smaller-scale projects, which might be treated as starting points for more representative research. The scope of these surveys includes: public perception of cultural heritage and archaeology, subjective value of cultural heritage, attitudes towards archaeology, relevance of archaeology for the present (also in terms of the socio-economic potential of archaeological heritage), people's interaction with archaeology and archaeological heritage, sources of information about archaeological heritage etc. Comparison of these data will serve to establish the relevance of surveys for archaeological heritage management. The author will also examine if the specific nature of archaeological heritage is reflected in the surveys and how the public feels about its most hidden heritage. Based on the results of her analysis, the author will look at the desired scope of a survey aimed at filling the identified gaps and shaped to fit the needs of evidence-based archaeological heritage management.

Highlights

  • Cultural heritage, as described by the European Heritage Strategy for the 21st century, 'is a key factor for the refocusing of our societies on the basis of dialogue between cultures, respect for identities and diversity, and a feeling of belonging to a community of values'

  • Over the past few years, cultural heritage has been the topic of several representative public opinion polls in Poland

  • In 2011 when respondents were asked about the three most important monuments in Poland, of the 268 monuments indicated only one archaeological site and one archaeological museum (Rynek Underground, Branch of the Museum of Krakow) (NICH 2011, unpublished results of the survey) were ranked. Such a low potential of archaeological heritage seems to give heritage managers every reason to despair; closer analysis of what the above survey questions implied may offer a beacon of hope for the future

Read more

Summary

Summary

Visitors observing long boats arriving at the Slavs and Vikings' Centre Wolin – Jomsborg – Vineta in north-western Poland, July 2013, © Agata Byszewska. Other data from Poland come from the 2017 Special Eurobarometer survey on cultural heritage They can be contrasted with archaeology-orientated opinion polls: a Europe-wide survey carried out within the NEARCH project led by Inrap (French National Institute for Preventive Archaeological Research) and several smaller-scale projects, which might be treated as starting points for more representative research. The scope of these surveys includes: public perception of cultural heritage and archaeology, subjective value of cultural heritage, attitudes towards archaeology, relevance of archaeology for the present ( in terms of the socio-economic potential of archaeological heritage), people's interaction with archaeology and archaeological heritage, sources of information about archaeological heritage etc. Based on the results of her analysis, the author will look at the desired scope of a survey aimed at filling the identified gaps and shaped to fit the needs of evidence-based archaeological heritage management

Introduction
Recent Cultural Heritage Opinion
Generally Fine
The Pitfalls of Categorisation
The Roles of Cultural Heritage
The Economic Potential
Responsibility for the Difficult Heritage
Who is Going to Care?
Findings
10. Benefits of Surveys and the Way Forward
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call