Abstract
John Loomis is an associate professor in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University. Gloria Helfand is an assistant professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics at University of California, Davis. To many, the Northern spotted owl of the Pacific Northwest symbolizes much of what is wrong with the Endangered Species Act. Forest workers accuse environmentalists of destroying their way of life to protect a worthless bird, while environmentalists accuse federal agencies of sacrificing an ecosystem for short-term economic gain. In contrast, land management agencies moved early and quickly to protect the habitat of the California spotted owl (a separate sub-species) so that it would not need to be listed as a threatened species. Although both owls will probably be protected in the end by similar land management strategies, the paths by which they have ended up there provide valuable lessons in how to (and how not to) protect potentially endangered species and ecosystems. This article compares public agency activity to protect these two species of owl. The comparison emphasizes the importance of ecosystem management and economic considerations under the Endangered Species Act.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.