Abstract
Background: No drug, used as adjuvant to spinal bupivacaine, has yet been identified that specifically inhibits nociception without its associated side-effects. Dexmedetomidines a novel alpha-2 agonist which holds promise as an intra-thecal adjuvant. Aims: This observational study was conducted to evaluate the onset and duration of sensory and motor block as well as perioperative analgesia and adverse effects of dexmedetomidine given intrathecally with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients belonging to age group 18-60 yrs, urban population, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists status I and II scheduled for lower abdominal and lower limb procedures were prospectively studied. Patients were randomly allocated to receive intrathecally either 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 5 μg (0.5 ml) dexmedetomidine (group D, n=30) or 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml NS (group B, n=30). Sensory and motor blockade charactersistics- The onset time to reach peak sensory and motor level, the regression time for sensory and motor block, time for rescue analgesia, hemodynamic changes and side-effects were recorded. Data collection was done by observation and measurement of various parameters. Results: The onset times to reach T10 dermatome, peak sensory level and onset time to reach modified Bromage 3 motor block were similar in both groups. We found that adding dexmedetomidine intrathecally significantly prolonged sensory and motor block time. time for first analgesic request was also significantly prolonged in group BD. Statistically there were no significant differences in hemodynamic alterations and other adverse effects between the groups. Conclusion: clinical advantage of dexmedetomidine is that it facilitates the spread of the block and offers prolonged post‑operative analgesia. The groups were similar with respect to hemodynamic variables and there were no significant side-effects in either of the groups. However, prolonged duration of motor blockade with dexmedetomidine may be undesirable for short‑term surgical procedures or ambulatory surgeries.
Highlights
Spinal anesthesia is the preferred mode of anesthesia for lower abdominal & lower limb elective and emergency surgeries because of its rapid onset, superior blockade, easy administration, less failure rates, safety and cost effectiveness
Inclusion & Exclusion criteria: 60 patients of both sex aged between 18-60 years belonging to American society of anesthesiologists grade I and II, undergoing elective surgeries on lower abdomen and lower limb under subarachnoid block of an expected duration over 90min Patients belonging to ASA grade III, IV and V, Liver and renal dysfunction, cardiac dysrrythmias, on ARBS, calcium channel blockers, weight > 120 kg or height
Hemodynamic: Systolic, diastolic arterial blood pressures, heart rates and oxygen saturations remained stable intraoperatively and in Post anaesthetic care unit (PACU), and there was no significant difference between the groups
Summary
Spinal anesthesia is the preferred mode of anesthesia for lower abdominal & lower limb elective and emergency surgeries because of its rapid onset, superior blockade, easy administration, less failure rates, safety and cost effectiveness. It has intra and postoperative antinociceptive effect, lower incidence of hemodynamic fluctuation compared to general anesthesia, considerable effect in reducing intraoperative bleeding and postoperative thromboembolic complications [1]. Aims: This observational study was conducted to evaluate the onset and duration of sensory and motor block as well as perioperative analgesia and adverse effects of dexmedetomidine given intrathecally with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Prolonged duration of motor blockade with dexmedetomidine may be undesirable for short‐term surgical procedures or ambulatory surgeries
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have