Abstract

One of the most important resources available in the field of fluid mechanics, the Moody Chart gives Darcy friction factor as a function of Reynolds number and relative roughness. The experimentalists who generated the data correlated in the Moody Chart, however, roughened pipe surfaces by coating their internal surfaces with a monolayer of sand, the pipe wall roughness being defined as the average diameter of the sand grains. Thus, the sand-grain roughness values required for use with the Moody Chart are not derived from any direct measure of roughness using modern surface characterization equipment, such as an optical profilometer. Using direct measurements of surface roughness in fluid flow calculations may therefore result in significant error. In this paper we present a simple algorithm with which various measured surface roughness parameters can be converted to equivalent sand-grain roughness. For nearly every surface roughness value converted to equivalent sand-grain roughness using the algorithm, better agreement with fluid flow experiments is seen over using the raw roughness value.

Highlights

  • The Moody Chart (Moody, 1944) represents one of the most widely used resources in fluid mechanics

  • Relating Darcy friction factor to Reynolds number and relative roughness, the Moody Chart correlates extensive experimental data obtained earlier by Nikuradse (1933), in which pipe surfaces were roughened by coating their internal surfaces with a layer of sand

  • Direct measurements of surface roughness may not be appropriate for fluid flow calculations and could lead to significant error

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Moody Chart (Moody, 1944) represents one of the most widely used resources in fluid mechanics. Values of roughness reported in tables in fluid mechanics texts and handbooks typically reflect an “equivalent sandgrain” idea of roughness, having been back-calculated by comparing pressure drop data from fluid flow experiments to the Moody Chart. These equivalent sand-grain roughness values do not result from any direct measurement of surface roughness using standard surface characterization equipment and the various definitions of surface roughness thereof. The work of Kandlikar et al (2005) was partly motivated by the very large relative roughnesses (up to 14%) encountered in microchannels They re-plotted the Moody Chart using the idea of a constricted flow diameter. Taylor et al (2005) gives an excellent review of much of this work

Proposed Roughness Conversion Algorithm
Generalized Algorithm
Experimental Validation
Results and Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call