Abstract
This article uses an eminently bibliographical methodology and seeks to shed light on how law theories use philosophical concepts derived from theories of the philosophy of ordinary language. Given this point, it is important to understand what the linguistic turn of events was, as well as its phases and influence on the human sciences in general, in order to understand how, through the philosophy of language, such philosophers as Kelsen, Ross and Hart have appropriated these concepts and “created” the assumptions of a new legal science. As a result, we present the influences that the theories of the Law of these authors suffered from the philosophy of the ideal and ordinary language of Wittgenstein and Austin.Keywords: Theory of Law, philosophy of ordinary language, linguistic turn.
Highlights
This article uses an eminently bibliographical methodology and seeks to shed light on how law theories use philosophical concepts derived from theories of the philosophy of ordinary language
Para Deleuze e Guatarri (1995), a teoria de Austin repercute na impossibilidade de conceber a linguagem apenas como um código e fala tão somente como comunicação de informação; na impossibilidade de definir uma Semântica, uma sintaxe ou uma fonética como zona científica independente da Pragmática; e, por fim, na impossibilidade de manter a distinção língua-fala, pois são o sentido e a sintaxe da língua que não se deixam definir independentemente dos atos de fala que ela pressupõe
A par, no entanto, da determinante voz da Filosofia da linguagem ordinária do segundo Wittgenstein e de Austin sobre os pilares da Teoria Contemporânea do Direito, percebe-se que a má compreensão desses pressupostos pode levar pesquisadores do Direito a errôneas conclusões e diálogos improváveis entre Kelsen, Ross e Hart
Summary
This article uses an eminently bibliographical methodology and seeks to shed light on how law theories use philosophical concepts derived from theories of the philosophy of ordinary language.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
