Abstract
This response essay contends that Tyson E. Lewis’s concept of the seminar as a revolutionary mechanism within the university is based on misunderstandings of Althusser’s theory of ideology and class struggle. Lewis formulates interpellation as Althusser’s “fundamental educational problematic.” To counter, this response clarifies how Althusser analyzes ISAs (with the operations of education as one of the diverse kinds of ISA). Further, it examines interpellation—the ongoing constitution of subjects—as a formation that is precedent to specific engagements in and across all apparatuses. We cannot readily reject, dissolve, or counter interpellation. Rather, interpellation ensnares individuals such that their potential relief from how they are constituted likely leads to another form of constitution—that is, interpellation. In opposition to Lewis, regarding the liberative gains to individuals through the seminar, this response proposes that, while navigating Althusser’s problematic, we keep in mind that revolution is not external to apparatuses or productive processes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
