A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of policosanol in adolescents with type II hypercholesterolemia

Abstract

Background: Atherosclerosis begins in childhood and is influenced by risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD), of which hypercholesterolemia is crucial. The rationale for treating hypercholesterolemia in childhood is to limit atherosclerosis development, for which adherence to a cholesterol-lowering diet is the first-choice therapy. Nevertheless, pharmacological intervention with bile acid-binding resins may be prescribed for patients older than 10 years, mainly those with family history of CHD, multiple risk factors, and/or severe hypercholesterolemia. Resins are effective and tolerable in this population, but their clinical use has been limited because of poor compliance due to unpalatability; other effective cholesterol-lowering drugs have not been recommended in this population because of the potential impact of drug-related adverse effects such as increases in transaminases, myopathies, and gastrointestinal disturbances. Thus, the need for safer, easy-to-take, and effective cholesterol-lowering agents for this population continues. Policosanol is a mixture of higher primary aliphatic alcohols purified from sugar cane wax with cholesterol-lowering effects proven in patients with type II hypercholesterolemia and dyslipidemia due to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Policosanol shows good safety and tolerability profiles, with no evidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) to date. This background supports the idea that policosanol could be a good candidate for treating hypercholesterolemia in children and adolescents, but it requires clinical demonstration. Objective: This 12-week study was undertaken to investigate the cholesterol-lowering effects and tolerability of policosanol in hypercholesterolemic patients aged 11 to 19 years. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, after 4 weeks of dietary stabilization, adolescents with type II hypercholesterolemia were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive placebo or policosanol 5-mg tablets once daily for 12 weeks. Physical examinations were performed, and lipid profiles and blood samples were obtained at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks of therapy. The treatment was considered effective if mean reductions of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were >15%. In addition, the percentages of patients reaching final values of LDL-C <3.4 mmol/L and optimal values of <2.8 mmol/L were also evaluated. The doses were doubled if LDL-C values were ≥3.4 mmol/L after 6 weeks of therapy. The incidence of AEs and compliance with study medications were also evaluated after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. Results: Fifty-five patients were enrolled in the study (28 policosanol, 27 placebo). Twenty-three patients (17 placebo, 6 policosanol) required dose titration at 6 weeks. After 12 weeks of therapy, policosanol significantly decreased LDL-C with respect to baseline and placebo (both P < 0.001), showing a mean reduction of 32.6%. Total cholesterol (TC) and TC/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and LDL-C/HDL-C ratios were reduced by 21.9%, 27.8%, and 37.2%, respectively, in the policosanol group ( P < 0.001, compared with baseline and placebo). HDL-C rose 10.1% ( P < 0.001), compared with baseline and placebo. Triglycerides were unaffected by policosanol. LDL-C, TC, and both atherogenic ratios were reduced significantly in the policosanol group ( P < 0.001), and significant increases in HDL-C values were observed at the 6-week interim checkup ( P < 0.001 vs baseline, P < 0.01 vs placebo). Twenty-five (89.3%) of 28 patients in the policosanol group showed LDL-C reductions >15% compared with 2 (7.4%) of 27 patients in the placebo group ( P < 0.001). In addition, 26 (92.8%) of 28 policosanol patients reached LDL-C values < 3.4 mmol/L compared with 4 (14.8%) of 27 patients in the placebo group ( P < 0.001). Likewise, the response rate for achievement of optimal values (LDL-C < 2.8 mmol/L) was also larger in the policosanol group (20/28; 71.4%) than in the placebo group (0/27; 0.0%) ( P < 0.001). Policosanol was well tolerated, with no drug-related effects found on physical examination. Blood biochemistry determinations revealed significantly lower alanine aminotransferase levels in the policosanol group after 6 weeks of therapy compared with placebo ( P < 0.05), as well as significant reductions in aspartate aminotransferase levels at 6 weeks ( P < 0.01) and 12 weeks ( P < 0.05) compared with baseline. No patients withdrew from the study, and only 3 patients (2 placebo, 1 policosanol) experienced mild AEs during the study; the placebo patients reported abdominal pain and constipation (1 each), and the policosanol patient reported polyphagia. Conclusions: Policosanol 5 mg/d appears to be well tolerated and effective as short-term treatment of hypercholesterolemia in adolescents.