A quantitative analysis of generation of saccadic eye movements by burst neurons

The midbrain superior colliculus (SC) generates a rapid saccadic eye movement to a sensory stimulus by recruiting a population of cells in its topographically organized motor map. Supra-threshold electrical microstimulation in the SC reveals that the site of stimulation produces a normometric saccade vector with little effect of the stimulation parameters. Moreover, electrically evoked saccades (E-saccades) have kinematic properties that strongly resemble natural, visual-evoked saccades (V-saccades). These findings support models in which the saccade vector is determined by a center-of-gravity computation of activated neurons, while its trajectory and kinematics arise from downstream feedback circuits in the brainstem. Recent single-unit recordings, however, have indicated that the SC population also specifies instantaneous kinematics. These results support an alternative model, in which the desired saccade trajectory, including its kinematics, follows from instantaneous summation of movement effects of all SC spike trains. But how to reconcile this model with microstimulation results? Although it is thought that microstimulation activates a large population of SC neurons, the mechanism through which it arises is unknown. We developed a spiking neural network model of the SC, in which microstimulation directly activates a relatively small set of neurons around the electrode tip, which subsequently sets up a large population response through lateral synaptic interactions. We show that through this mechanism the population drives an E-saccade with near-normal kinematics that are largely independent of the stimulation parameters. Only at very low stimulus intensities the network recruits a population with low firing rates, resulting in abnormally slow saccades.

Saccadic model and stability of equilibrium point with different sigmoidal functions

Currently people deal with various entities (such as hardware, software, buildings, spaces, communities and other people), to meet specific goals while going about their everyday activities in work and leisure environments. These entities have become more and more complex and incorporate functions that hitherto had never been allocated such as automation, use in virtual environments, connectivity, personalization, mobility and friendliness. This book contributes to the analysis of human-system interactions from the perspective of ergonomics, regardless of how simple or complex they are, while incorporating the needs of users and workers in a healthy safe, efficient and enjoyable manner. This book provides a comprehensive review of the state of the art of current ergonomic in design methods and techniques that are being applied to products, machinery, equipment, workstations and systems while taking new technologies and their applications into consideration. Ergonomics in Design: Methods and Techniques is organized into four sections and 30 chapters covering topics such as conceptual aspects of ergonomics in design, the knowledge of human characteristics applied to design, and the methodological aspects of design. Examples are shown in several areas of design including, but not limited to, consumer products, games, transport, education, architecture, fashion, sustainability, biomechanics, intelligent systems, virtual reality, and neurodesign. This book will: Introduces the newest developments in social-cultural approaches Shows different ergonomics in design methodological approaches Divulges the ways that ergonomics can contribute to a successful design Applies different subjects to support the design including –ergonomics, engineering, architecture, urbanism, neuro, and product designs. Presents recent technologies in ergonomic design, as applied to product design. With the contributions from a team of 75 researchers from 11 countries, the book covers the state-of-the-art of ergonomics in a way to produce better design.

This study explored the relationship between single motor unit (MU) firing rates (FRs) and limb movement velocity during voluntary shortening contractions when accounting for the effects of time course variability between different kinematic comparisons. Single MU trains recorded by intramuscular electromyography in agonist muscles of the anconeus (n = 15 participants) and lateral head of the triceps brachii (n = 6) were measured during each voluntary shortening contraction. Elbow extension movements consisted of a targeted velocity occurring along the sagittal plane at 25, 50, 75 and 100% of maximum velocity. To account for the effect of differences in contraction time course between parameters, each MU potential was time locked throughout the shortening muscle contraction and linked with separated kinematic parameters of the elbow joint. Across targeted movement velocities, instantaneous FRs were significantly correlated with elbow extension rate of torque development (r = 0.45) and torque (r = 0.40), but FRs were not correlated with velocity (r = 0.03, p = n.s.). Instead, FRs had a weak indirect relationship with limb movement velocity and position assessed through multiple correlation of the stepwise kinematic progression. Results show that voluntary descending synaptic inputs correspond to a more direct relationship between agonist muscle FRs and torque during shortening contractions, but not velocity. Instead, FRs were indirectly correlated to preparing the magnitude of imminent movement velocity of the lagging limb through torque.

Changing the direction of the line of sight is essential for the visual exploration of our environment. When the head does not move, re-orientation of the visual axis is accomplished with high velocity, conjugate movements of the eyes known as saccades. Our understanding of the neural mechanisms that control saccadic eye movements has advanced rapidly as specific hypotheses have been developed, evaluated and sometimes rejected on the basis of new observations. Constraints on new hypotheses and new tests of existing models have often arisen from the careful assessment of behavioral observations. The definition of the set of features (or rules) of saccadic eye movements was critical in the development of hypotheses of their neural control. When the head is free to move, changes in the direction of the line of sight can involve simultaneous saccadic eye movements and movements of the head. When the head moves in conjunction with the eyes to accomplish these shifts in gaze direction, the rules that helped define head-restrained saccadic eye movements are altered. For example, the slope relationship between duration and amplitude for saccadic eye movements is reversed (the slope is negative) during gaze shifts of similar amplitude initiated with the eyes in different orbital positions. Modifications to the hypotheses developed in head-restrained subjects may be needed to account for these new observations. This review briefly recounts features of head-restrained saccadic eye movements, and then describes some of the characteristics of coordinated eye-head movements that have led to development of new hypotheses describing the mechanisms of gaze shift control.

Convergence of Different Sensory Modalities in a Single Cell of Flocculus in Alert Cat

During visual fixation, we constantly move our eyes. These microscopic eye movements are composed of tremor, drift, and microsaccades. Early studies concluded that microsaccades, like larger saccades, are binocular and conjugate, as expected from Hering's law of equal innervation. Here, we document the existence of monocular microsaccades during both fixation and a discrimination task, reporting the location of the gap in a foveal, low-contrast letter C. Monocular microsaccades differ in frequency, amplitude, and peak velocity from binocular microsaccades. Our analyses show that these differences are robust to different velocity and duration criteria that have been used previously to identify microsaccades. Also, the frequency of monocular microsaccades differs systematically according to the task: monocular microsaccades occur more frequently during fixation than discrimination, the opposite of their binocular equivalents. However, during discrimination, monocular microsaccades occur more often around the discrimination threshold, particularly for each subject's dominant eye and in case of successful discrimination. We suggest that monocular microsaccades play a functional role in the production of fine corrections of eye position and vergence during demanding visual tasks.

Behavior of neurons in the abducens nucleus of the alert cat—I. Motoneurons

It is an essential feature for the visual system to keep track of self-motion to maintain space constancy. Therefore the saccadic system uses extraretinal information about previous saccades to update the internal representation of memorized targets, an ability that has been identified in behavioral and electrophysiological studies. However, a smooth eye movement induced in the latency period of a memory-guided saccade yielded contradictory results. Indeed some studies described spatially accurate saccades, whereas others reported retinal coding of saccades. Today, it is still unclear how the saccadic system keeps track of smooth eye movements in the absence of vision. Here, we developed an original two-dimensional behavioral paradigm to further investigate how smooth eye displacements could be compensated to ensure space constancy. Human subjects were required to pursue a moving target and to orient their eyes toward the memorized position of a briefly presented second target (flash) once it appeared. The analysis of the first orientation saccade revealed a bimodal latency distribution related to two different saccade programming strategies. Short-latency (<175 ms) saccades were coded using the only available retinal information, i.e., position error. In addition to position error, longer-latency (>175 ms) saccades used extraretinal information about the smooth eye displacement during the latency period to program spatially more accurate saccades. Sensory parameters at the moment of the flash (retinal position error and eye velocity) influenced the choice between both strategies. We hypothesize that this tradeoff between speed and accuracy of the saccadic response reveals the presence of two coupled neural pathways for saccadic programming. A fast striatal-collicular pathway might only use retinal information about the flash location to program the first saccade. The slower pathway could involve the posterior parietal cortex to update the internal representation of the flash once extraretinal smooth eye displacement information becomes available to the system.

Visual Responses on Neck Muscles Reveal Selective Gating that Prevents Express Saccades